View more on these topics

Malcolm Kerr: Why more asset managers should consider no-fee funds  


Fidelity’s new zero-fee index funds have rocked the boat in the US. Players here must sit up and take notice

I was interested to see that Fidelity has launched two new index funds in the US: Fidelity Zero Total Market
and Fidelity Zero International. Both have an expense ratio of zero per cent.

Fidelity was late to the ETF and index fund explosion in the States but it looks like it is using its scale to accelerate growth in this space and win its battle with BlackRock, Charles Schwab and Vanguard.

Scale is important and Fidelity is a huge international player with annual revenues of around $18bn. That is twice the revenues of the entire ETF market and four times the revenues of Vanguard. So, even if this strategy is a loss leader, it can afford to roll with it.

Leap of faith: Will performance fees restore trust in active managers?

This got me thinking about index funds generally; why they have experienced exponentially increased inflows over the past few years and what might happen next.

Where it all began

The story starts in 1976 with the launch of the Bogle-LeBaron First Index Fund, which only achieved 10 per cent of its $150m target – unsurprising in retrospect, as it carried an 8.5 per cent sales charge. It also encountered tracking challenges resulting from a need to reduce costs and only sampling the smaller stocks in the S&P 500 as opposed to all of them.

Renamed Vanguard Index, merging with another Vanguard fund and tracking the entire S&P 500, the proposition started to gain traction. By 1987, it had reached $500m and other players had joined the market. Technology reduced trading costs, competition brought expense ratios down and tracking errors were almost eliminated.

But penetration in the UK was minimal. The reason was simple: they did not pay commission to advisers. This all changed with the emergence of Transact and others, where fees could be taken from
the platform.

And it is no coincidence that, on some platforms, index funds occupied the top spot in terms of flows. Index fund sales growth was then further fuelled by players such as Dimensional, which were evangelists for the proposition and knew how to market it. Finally, RDR and the complete removal of commission bias.

RDR was designed to provide complete transparency of adviser fees and the use of index funds reduced the overall client charge. Some suggest this might have contributed to increased sales. Others say advisers lost confidence in the value that active managers brought to the party. My guess is that it was a combination of both.

Malcolm Kerr: Do the risks outweigh the benefits for the modern adviser?

Most direct-to-consumer digital platforms now use index funds. That is sensible, particularly if their target market is first-time investors and/or consumers looking to make regular investments. Costs are low and the proposition simple.

The reason I mention regular investors is that a portfolio comprised primarily of index funds is unlikely to be suitable for most clients looking for sustainable income. There must be scope for a divestment index not based on the size of companies’ market capital. There are ETFs based on dividend yield that might have a role to play, for example. But, in the meantime, active management seems a more sensible approach…

What next?

So, where next? If index funds are a commodity, then Fidelity could be on to a winner in terms of shares in this increasingly popular space. But perhaps there is more to it than that. What about brand? What about service? What about stock-lending strategy and governance? Are there trade-offs? I think there might be.

After all, if a US adviser rates a manager highly in these areas, would they want to move client money from Schwab or Vanguard or BlackRock to save a few dollars?

And then there are other issues to consider, such as the cost of the adviser’s time and tax wrapper implications.

Darius McDermott: Is now the time to give up on equities?

More important for us, though, will Fidelity and others export their US pricing strategy to the UK market? If so, how will it impact advisers and fund managers? Seems to me it would be good news for the former and their clients but a challenge for the latter.

There may be a way to mitigate the loss and that might be the 0.02 per cent or so revenues that could be generated by lending stock to short sellers. But are these revenues reinvested to the benefit of the investor? If so, they might amount to more than the annual fees. Or are they retained by the fund manager?

If the revenues are retained by the fund manager, could we see the retail index fund market models turned on their head? If stock lending generates enough revenue for the manager, then perhaps the next step from zero charges might be paying investors to invest rather than charging them.

Before you commit me to the asylum let us think seriously about this. Could it not be a cost-effective way for some players to engage new customers and then, over time, sell them highly profitable propositions such as actively managed drawdown solutions?

Malcolm Kerr is an independent consultant



FCA and CII announce new exam to ‘reassess’ Level 4 qualifications

The FCA and Chartered Insurance Institute have announced a new test to reassess whether or not advisers with the Level 4 Diploma in Financial Planning still have sufficient knowledge. From 1 October, the Regulated Retail Investment Adviser Re-Evaluation assessment will be available after a collaboration between the FCA and CII aimed at raising the standards […]


Zurich rolls out new protection platform

Zurich has launched a new life protection platform giving clients more flexibility on policies and making it easier for the company to develop new products. The company said its old platform was actually six systems working together which was less efficient and made it more expensive to innovate. According to market management head Peter Hamilton […]


True Potential put up for sale

Platform, fund management and advice business True Potential has been put up for sale, in a deal that could be worth up to £2bn, according to Sky News. It is reported True Potential has appointed bankers from Perella Weinberg Partners to deal with offers from prospective buyers. The company is owned 739 individual partners, with a […]

A whiff of stagflation

Read our latest Investment Clock Strategy report ‘A whiff of stagflation’ from Trevor Greetham, Head of Multi Asset at RLAM. The report covers various topical themes and also explains why Trevor is now only marginally overweight equities in multi asset funds but would still be willing to buy dips. Read the report here Past performance […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Malcolm, I agree it will only be a matter of time before Fund managers are paying investors.

    But in the weird world of MIFID II transaction calculations there are already several UK funds out there paying investors to invest! For example;

    Blackrock ACS World ex UK Equity Tracker X1 Acc Sedol BYV1TY6

    OK the OCF is 3bp, however if you take into account the negative transaction charge of -4bp in theory you are receiving 1bp.

    As I am now saying “Past charges are no guide to future charges”!

  2. I can see a way for active managers to have nil fees.

    Once they achieve (say) 10% growth the can take (say) 1% of the profit. For every 2% above that they can take an additional X BPS. Yes it’s a charge by any other name. But it is somewhat different than taking a straight 1% from the whole fund.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm