Funds with a static asset allocation have delivered higher returns than other types of strategy over the past four years, research has found.
A study conducted by Aegon and shared with Money Marketing shows funds that did not make market calls and cost less have performed better than more expensive funds, which followed a tactical or strategic asset allocation.
Aegon looked at data from Morningstar on 23 funds, and five simulated static allocation portfolios with returns after an average 0.22 per cent charge. The firm compared average returns with those of its Balanced Plus Core Portfolio, which follows a strategic asset allocation, and 16 tactically allocated funds.
For a mid-risk fund, the analysis shows that, between 2013 and 2017, a static asset allocation delivered an average return of 11.7 per cent, outperforming 9.6 per cent for a strategic allocation and 8.2 per cent for a tactical asset allocation. This means funds that applied a tactical allocation, which usually changed daily, weekly or quarterly and cost from 0.45 per cent to 0.70 per cent, have underperformed cheaper and less active funds.
Aegon investment director Nick Dixon says: “In recent years markets have been on a strong upward trend and managers who have attempted to identify areas of outperformance through short-term changes have fared less well than funds that take a static approach or those who imp-lement strategic changes based on long-term expectations.”
However, while the findings cover a period of bull market, Aegon warns that strategic asset allocation is more suitable in turbulent market times.