View more on these topics

Asset allocation: Henderson’s de Bunsen nervous on corporate bonds

de Bunsen-James-Henderson-2014

Does the corporate bond market know something everyone else doesn’t? This is the question currently occupying Henderson multi-asset team fund manager James de Bunsen.

Credit spreads are widening materially, more than the underlying data would appear to merit, and for de Bunsen it warrants some caution.

He says the problem might be explicable were it simply high-yield spreads that had widened out because high yield is “over-owned” and had become very expensive. The concern is investment grade spreads have also moved significantly and the market believes a rise in default rates is possible, even for the highest quality companies.

De Bunsen says: “We are looking at this phenomenon and asking whether we are missing something. Bond investors tend to think of themselves as less blindly optimistic than equity investors. The shift has been meaningful at a time when defaults are not picking up. The stress in the energy and resources sectors has now spread elsewhere.”

He believes this suggests a change in mentality. The bond markets have delivered strong returns for investors over the past five years and no one is expecting losses. He adds: “This may be a more difficult world. The risk aversion in credit markets may take hold in equity markets.”

The group has responded by taking money out of its dedicated high yield exposure, reducing the weighting from 4 per cent to 2 per cent in the Multi-Manager Income & Growth fund. De Bunsen says the team retains some strategic bond fund exposure.

The team has also reduced its equity weightings in the fund by around 5 per cent, which is currently sitting in cash. Specifically, de Bunsen has reduced the European and Japanese holdings in the fund. “This downturn started with China and emerging markets and a lot of money has came out of those markets. In contrast, there was a lot of money still going into Japan and Europe.” This suggested prices had been pushed too high.

He remains relatively positive on emerging markets although admits the outlook varies hugely for different emerging markets. India, for example, has the “perfect storm” of falling interest rates, rising growth and a reform agenda. This is in contrast to Brazil, which “looks dreadful”. That said, the Indian market has barely fallen, while the MSCI Brazil is down 47 per cent over the past year in US dollar terms to 8 October.

De Bunsen says: “The danger is there is an accident, possibly in Brazil, but that is not our central case. The valuations provide a significant margin of safety. Who is left to sell? We could see emerging markets outperform from here. We hold a very marginal overweight in our funds.”

He feels the same way about the UK market, which has been hit hard because of its mining and commodities exposure. With some stocks down 60-70 per cent, he believes it would not be difficult for them to rally 20 per cent. There is no explicit exposure in the fund, but they are more positive on the UK as a result.

Part of the reason for de Bunsen’s caution is the variability of the economic data. “What’s the catalyst for everyone to feel happy and put money into equities once again? The support has gone for equity and high yield. Every time there was this type of volatility, the central banks have done quantitative easing, but now they’ve done their ‘big bazookas’.”

He points out there was a time when bad data was good for risk assets because it meant central bankers were likely to do more QE. He says: “Manufacturing and jobs data have weakened a little, just at the point where we thought we’d reached take-off velocity. That said, the consumer side is strong and the housing market is doing well.”

In the US, the group believes the data will improve. A pattern has emerged of weak data in the first quarter with a bounceback in the latter part of the year. Nevertheless, the US equity market looks very expensive and leaves little room for error should economic data disappoint.

De Bunsen says it has been a good time to be invested with the “winners”, strong companies with stable earnings growth, but he believes it is prudent to keep recycling profits into those areas of the market where sentiment has become very bearish and where valuations offer a greater margin of safety. If the credit market is right and recovery is weakening, then these areas may have less far to fall.



Zurich looks to cut admin and support roles

Zurich UK Life is looking to cut administration and support roles as part of a restructure of its retail sales team. The provider says it anticipates reducing the number of roles by 29 and has entered a consultation period with those affected. Zurich says it also plans to “streamline” some of its management functions with […]


UK inflation turns negative

UK inflation slipped into negative territory again in September, driven by the falling price of food and reduced motoring costs. The 12-month Consumer Prices Index inflation rate dropped to -0.1 per cent in September, down from 0 per cent in August. It is the second time the Office for National Statistics has reported negative inflation […]


Intrinsic hikes AR fees to meet ‘unprecedented’ FSCS levy

Intrinsic is to hike adviser fees from January 2016 to help it meet an “unprecedented” rise in the cost of regulation. In a letter sent to advisers last week, the Old Mutual-owned network said its FSCS bill was £5.5m, £2.8m more than was expected. Intrinsic says it has absorbed around half the cost of the […]


Old Mutual advice launch ‘threatens advisers and savers’

Old Mutual Wealth’s decision to launch a national advice division could pose at threat to networks and lead to bad outcomes for investors, experts warn. The new business will be branded Old Mutual Wealth Private Client Advisers and will draw on the investment offerings from Quilter Cheviot and Old Mutual Global Investors. The business will […]

Cricket - thumbnail

England vs Australia: pensions

Well, the cricket season is here, and England and Australia are stepping up to the wicket. Although we compete with each other in the sporting world, when it comes to pensions, Australia’s pension programme is held up as a model for our auto-enrolment initiative. Auto-enrolment was introduced because people weren’t saving enough into their pensions, and it is still early days but signs are positive. However, in Australia, saving into a pension is compulsory, and in fact employers are the ones who have to pay in. Employees in Australia can make additional contributions into their pensions, but they don’t have to. Should the onus be on the employer or employee to save? Well in the UK we think it’s both, but to get ‘adequate’ savings for retirement it’s the employee who has to pay more in.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment