View more on these topics

Ascentric admin charge move

Ascentric is planning to introduce an admin charge from April for funds on its platform with low assets under administration.

The firm is talking to fund managers about applying a charge of up to £40 a month on funds with assets;below £100,000.

It says the fee will clean up some of the funds that are not actively being used by advisers, cover associated running costs and fund a new suite of management information reports which the firm is introducing to provide fund managers with detailed analysis of investment activity.

Head of marketing Dominic Ventham says: “Where administration charges are applied, the new management information reports will provide a helpful tool for devising app-ropriate future fund distribution strategies.

“Clearly, under the proposed retail distribution review rules, we expect that we will be required to disclose this fully as an income from product providers.”

The Platforum managing director Holly Mackay says: “To some degree, it is inevitable but it is a particularly difficult message for Ascentric because they sell themselves clearly as offering unfettered access to funds and tax wrappers.

“They are not saying they will stop doing that but we know the commercial realities are that it will make it harder for the boutique asset managers to get in front of financial advisers.”



Sants flees an uncertain future

The sudden resignation of Hector Sants last night is more an indicator than a cause of the huge uncertainty hanging over the governance of financial services regulation.

Natixis video: Making smarter use of asset classes

Content supplied by Natixis Global Asset Management This video from Natixis Global Asset Management focuses on Active Share. One strategy for the smarter use of equity investments is ensuring you get what you pay for. According to the company, looking at Active Share can give you a better perspective on where performance comes from. Active […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Ray Kuhler - Alquity Investment Management 11th February 2010 at 11:39 am

    ‘Funds that are not actively being used by advisers’.

    But what if the fund is performing as expected and as explained to the client and the manager refuses to pay the additional charge?

    Is the adviser then forced to sell and if they are then why hadn’t they prior to this event? How has the client’s requirement changed.

    Seems a strange way for a professional firm to asset allocate.

  2. And what if this creates a Capital Gains charge ?

    This is the “lie” to open-architecture

  3. And what about ETFs or ITs which don’t pay platform charges, As Holly says if you are unfettered then it is a little odd to then charge fund providers just because some IFAs have used your fund. Also what about a group with a fund over say £10m and another sub £100k, On balance if I was a fund group I would be tempted to say no to the £40….

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm