View more on these topics

Are model portfolios still on point?

Evidence mounts model portfolio risk ratings may not be reliable

A lack of clarity about how model portfolios are risk rated could mean advisers and clients end up choosing inappropriate investments.

Research seen by Money Marketing shows a significant disparity in ratings on products with the same label.

Analysis of more than 500 model portfolios carried out by risk profiling service Dynamic Planner exposes how different the asset allocation and strategies of portfolios with the same description can be. It reviewed some 540 model portfolios used by advisers, comparing their labelling and stated risk rating.

Among growth portfolios the median risk score was six, but the risk ratings for the group varied from two right up to 10 at the top of the scale; a significant variance for a group of investment portfolios with the same overall objective.

Income portfolios vary from a maxi-mum profile of seven to a minimum of two around their median of five.

Dynamic Planner proposition director Chris Jones says: “There is this anomaly where the name of a fund or portfolio doesn’t have anything to do with its risk level. When you see it in black and white, you realise how striking this disparity can be.”

The major concern in this is that advisers and their clients could end up investing in unsuitable portfolios because they have been labelled in a way that does not reflect their underlying asset allocation.

Of the portfolios analysed that had a risk rating of two, the maximum allocation to emerging markets equities was just 1 per cent. Meanwhile, portfolios rated a 10 on the risk spectrum had up to 62 per cent of their assets in emerging markets equities.

Portfolios rated a two typically had 52.8 per cent of their assets in cash, while no portfolios with a 10 rating held any cash. It means the strategies and therefore outcomes of growth portfolios, which may have a risk profile of anything from two to 10, are entirely different.

This significant variation in risk profile is not just evident in growth and income portfolios either. The risk ratings on balanced portfolios ranged from three to six on the Dynamic Planner risk scale.

Defaqto insight consultant Fraser Donaldson says: “I don’t think this vagueness is anything new. If you compare cautious portfolios A and B, they can be wildly different.”

FCA moots action

A key issue is that while risk metrics have evolved, they still have many subjective elements. One investor’s balanced may be another person’s aggressive, and the danger of trying to firm up the definitions too much is that they become excessively narrow.


James Hay weighs up future of orphan clients

Platform James Hay is weighing up how to manage orphan clients as it predicts the number on its platform will increase in the coming years. Speaking to Money Marketing, James Hay chief executive Alastair Conway says the platform has started looking into orphan clients and whether it needs to do anything for those on its […]


Lifetime allowance 2018/19 increase confirmed but pensions absent

The Government has confirmed that the lifetime allowance 2018/19 will rise in line with inflation, but savers have been offered little else in the Autumn Budget. The lifetime allowance will increase from £1m to £1,030,000 to match CPI from 2018/19.  Though the maximum amount the can be saved each year into a Junior Isa or […]


FSCS hit with more than 200 claims over collapsed Sipp provider

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has received more than 200 claims against the collapsed Lifetime Sipp Company in less than two months. Company data provided to Money Marketing by the FSCS showed 19 claims had been received as at 30 May. However, the FSCS confirmed this week that the number of claims has now ballooned […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Model portfolios are fine if you have model clients, but I have yet to come across two people who have exactly the same requirements.

    For those devoted to these models, perhaps they need to take warning – model portfolios are ideally suited to AI and Robo advice. If you don’t (or can’t) offer bespoke advice you may well face a bleak future.

  2. “As a result, the FCA is considering putting model portfolios into the same regime that is already applied to multi-asset funds, with each portfolio required to declare a risk-based benchmark as part of its objective.”

    Says it all. How about acknowledging the elephant in the room and recognising that the majority of model portfolios most likely fall under the definition of an AIF. If it looks like a multi-asset fund, walks like a multi-asset fund and talks like a multi-asset fund then it probably is, regardless of its ‘label’ – after all that’s what this article is about.

    On the other hand, if they are not AIFs then the first job is to define exactly what model portfolios are before you attempt to adopt a new regime around them.

  3. Are people really investing into a portfolio based on its name? A portfolio titled, ‘Superior Return Managed Portfolio’ is going to make a killing then.

  4. Stephen Hatherall 6th August 2018 at 11:49 am

    Another dreadful Americanism in the headline.

    Why on earth is the phrase ‘on point’ being used in this context

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm