View more on these topics

Arck boss handed 10-year sentence for £50m fraud


Former Arck partner Richard Clay has been sentenced to 10 years and 10 months in prison for his part in a £50m fraud.

His fellow ex partner Kathryn Clark was handed a two year suspended sentence.

In December 2014, Clay pleaded guilty to three fraud charges following a joint investigation by the Serious Fraud Office and Nottinghamshire Police.

Clark pleaded guilty in July and October 2014 to three fraud charges and two counts of forgery.

In 2012 Money Marketing revealed how investors faced losses of around £50m after the liquidation of Arck, a specialist property investment firm that invested pension savings through Sipp firm HD Sipp.

The pair were due to be sentenced in February, but the case was subject to delays.

In March, Clark was banned from directorship for 14 years, while Clay was banned for 15 years.

In March 2014, Yorkshire Bank – which provided banking facilities to Arck investors – set up a scheme to support 700 investors who lost money.

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme is still considering claims against advisers in relation to Arck.



Senior Tory urges providers to plug financial education gap

Treasury select committee member and Conservative MP Mark Garnier has called on pension providers to do more in schools to promote savings education. Speaking at the Conservative party conference in Manchester today, Garnier said he was comfortable with the idea of commercial organisations providing resources to boost the financial knowledge of young people. Influential figures […]


Bill Gross sues Pimco for ‘hundreds of millions’

Bill Gross is suing Pimco for “hundreds of millions of dollars” on the grounds he was pushed out of the business, according to Bloomberg. The bond guru left Pimco in September last year, having co-founded the firm in 1971, and joined Janus Capital in a move that shocked the industry. Gross claims Pimco owes him […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Why is the FSCS considering claims against advisers who recommended Arck products in the wake of their failure due to criminal activities about which they [advisers] could hardly have been expected to know? Ah ~ due diligence.

Leave a comment