View more on these topics

Arch cru clients can take FSA deal and still claim on IFAs

Arch cru investors who agree to an FSA £54m compensation package will still be able to make a claim against their IFA.

The deal, agreed between the regulator and Capita, BNY Mellon & Depository Ltd and HSBC Bank this week, is designed to give investors around 70 per cent of net asset value of the fund range’s assets when it was suspended in March 13, 2009, when added to previous distribution payments and remaining assets.

Investors taking the compensation must agree it is in full and final settlement of any claims against the three firms. However, the FSA has confirmed that investors can still make a claim against their IFA.

The FSA says it is still considering the role of other parties in the Arch cru debacle.

A statement from the FSCS says: “The FSCS is considering the implications of this development for claims that it has received arising from investments made by claimants in these funds. These claims for compensation have been made against various Independent Financial Advisors that are no longer trading. We will provide further information about our position to claimants as soon as we are able to.”

Informed Choice managing director Martin Bamford says: “There are unresolved issues over who was at fault for the suspension and those IFAs who sold the products heavily.”

Churchill Investments director Chris Gilchrist says: “Given the amount of anxious people there have been, I am sure that most will take 70 per cent of the investment and draw a line under this. The FSA still has questions to answer and accountability of others must still be looked at.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. when does “full and final” become “full and final except IFAs”!
    Oh yes in FSA world..

  2. Let’s wait for the detail before we have spurious speculation in respect of what may happen next.

    In principle, yes, investors do have a potential case in action against their IFAs, subject to the following legal principles being established:

    Causation – how did the financial loss occur?

    Liability – who is responsible for the loss?

    Quantum – the actual amount of loss?

    While I did not recommend these funds to my clients, it does strike me that the provider either misled advisers over the planned intentions and risk profile of the funds, and then went on to ‘massage’ the valuations.

    It remains to be seen whether the other professional parties were in breach of their duty of care, but it appears to be grossly unfair to expect IFAs to pick up the tab.

    Finally, if 70% of the value at suspension equates to the true value of the funds at that time – where is the loss?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm