View more on these topics

Appeal process

I wonder just how many in the financial services industry realise that they may now appeal to an independent tribunal should they feel that the FSA has acted unfairly towards them?

The process, I am told, is amazingly simple. It consists of a two-page form to be completed and submitted to the Financial Services & Markets Tribunal situated in the Bloomsbury area of London.

Their plea will be heard by the tribunal under its president, Stephen Oliver, QC, who promises to hold most cases in public and to keep the experience both “civil and civilising”. Above all, however, he is an independent force appointed by the Lord Chancellor&#39s department as opposed to the original suggestion of the appointee being a Treasury candidate.

So who do they have to thank for this eleventh-hour concession by the Treasury? Well, interestingly enough, the tribunal is seeing the light of day thanks to the insight and doggedness of a group of politicians including Francis Maude, Howard Flight and Lord Saatchi – together with the members of a cross-party Parliamentary committee under Lord Burns.

And who else do the members of the financial services industry have to thank for the knowhow and determination of these politicians?

For a start, they should consider thanking the pugnacious Garry Heath, predecessor to Paul Smee at Aifa, who stood up so firmly against the onslaught of Patricia Hewitt.

Without that successful stand and the hope that it gave to many in financial services, I suspect that great numbers would have got out or have been driven out of the industry.

The encouragement given to many by that stand resulted in some financial professionals banding together, originally at the behest of Peter Lilley (then shadow chancellor), in order to make him aware of some of the pending injustices against, and downright impediments to, a vibrant commercial world which is appreciated both at home and internationally.

Remember the trade figures reference to “hidden earnings” often running into hundreds of millions of pounds and reflect what might have happened and indeed what oppressive deterrent could now be hanging over the industry had not a few intelligent, resourceful, articulate and influential people got together to promote fair and open regulation.

R A Francis

The City Group, London

Recommended

R&SA closes to new with-profits business

Royal & Sun Alliance is closing its £12 billion with-profits fund to new business. It has denied that the move is because of financial strength concerns, Existing policyholders will still be able to pay into the fund. R&SA says the move reflects its view that the market will move towards managed unit-linked products.R& SA UK […]

Pink Home Loans – Exclusive 2 Year Fixed Rate Self Cert

Monday, December 17, 2001.Type: Fixed rate self-certification mortgage.Fixed term: Until January 31, 2004.Fixed rate: 6.49 per cent.Minimum loan: £25,001.Maximum loan: Loans of up to 75 per cent of valuation subject to amaximum of £500,000, 76-85 per cent subject to a maximum of£400,000. First-time buyers up to 85 per cent of valuation subject to amaximum of […]

Royal & SunAlliance offers variety for trustees

Royal & Sun AllianceTrustee Investment PlanType: Trustee investment plan.Minimum premium: Lump sum £10,000.Investment choice: Cash deposit, fixed interest, index-linked, pension protector, balanced growth, managed growth, unitised with-profits, equity, FTSE allshare tracker, property, UK leader and eurotech.Charges: Annual up to 1 per cent.Allocation rate: 100 per cent.Options: Penalty free withdrawals up to 5 per cent a […]

Abbey delighted with Treasury decision

Abbey National says it is delighted that the Treasury has listened to feedback from lenders as well as consumer bodies in deciding to extend regulation to mortgage advice. Managing director (retail banking) Andrew Pople says the move means lenders will not be put in the “uncomfortable position” of being responsible for the guidance provided by […]

Cricket - thumbnail

England vs Australia: pensions

Well, the cricket season is here, and England and Australia are stepping up to the wicket. Although we compete with each other in the sporting world, when it comes to pensions, Australia’s pension programme is held up as a model for our auto-enrolment initiative. Auto-enrolment was introduced because people weren’t saving enough into their pensions, and it is still early days but signs are positive. However, in Australia, saving into a pension is compulsory, and in fact employers are the ones who have to pay in. Employees in Australia can make additional contributions into their pensions, but they don’t have to. Should the onus be on the employer or employee to save? Well in the UK we think it’s both, but to get ‘adequate’ savings for retirement it’s the employee who has to pay more in.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com