View more on these topics

Apfa’s Linda Smith: FCA’s data strategy needs to be overhauled

The FCA has inherited a sprawling data strategy from the FSA but it needs to reduce the reporting burden for low risk sectors, such as financial advisers.


Reporting has long been an issue for many firms. The FCA is reviewing its data strategy as it recognises industry concerns around data collection as inherited from the FSA.

As an example of the problem that the FCA faces with this review, its business plan for 2013/14 states that it inherited 220 databases from the FSA that hold information for 25 key systems. Not a great starting point!

Apfa believes that increased professionalism of firms since the introduction of the RDR should mean regulatory dividends, including a reduction in the level of reporting.

The FCA’s review is starting with a proof of concept in the UK retail investment market to demonstrate that the work is feasible and beneficial. We call on the FCA to justify the information it collects and to ensure that data is shared across the whole organisation so that duplication does not occur.

There are also some general issues that could be amended around the RMAR that would make a significant difference to firms. The short timeframe within which the data must be submitted presents problems, and it has been suggested that submission 13 weeks from the end of the reporting period would be more appropriate.

Frequency of reporting is also an issue for smaller firms – annual submission rather than six monthly should be sufficient for regulatory purposes for a sector that is low risk. In addition, the level of information required is unnecessarily detailed for routine collection.

Apfa has reviewed the RMAR and considers that some sections need reviewing to ensure that the data is relevant and has a purpose. Those that are particularly onerous include:

  • Section D on regulatory capital needs streamlining. This could automatically draw data from previous returns and link with other sections wherever possible.
  • Section E. PII self-certification could be covered off with a declaration confirming that a firm holds compliant cover with more detail provided if not.
  • Section G. Training and competence data is unlikely to change much between reporting periods so should be pre-populated with data from last return and amended if things change.
  • Section I on supplementary product sales data. PSD is collected from providers and it is unclear what they are trying to achieve here.
  • Section J on data for calculation of fees, to be completed once a year. This could link more intelligently with data required under section B and should automatically draw data from elsewhere wherever possible.
  • Section K on adviser charging. It is difficult to understand how such detailed information is of use to the FCA and why it needs to be reported on a regular basis. If the FCA has concerns about what is happening in the market, it could request data as part of a thematic review rather than include it in the regular reporting pack.
  • Section L on consultancy charging. As with section K, it is unclear why this level of detail is needed on a regular basis.

Sections A, B and C appear to comprise information that is reasonable for a regulator to collect.

We would welcome members’ thoughts on the RMAR:

Linda Smith is senior technical adviser at the Association of Professional Financial Advisers



Transact: Firms may start charging clients for switching to clean

Transact believes platforms or fund managers could start looking at charging clients to recoup the costs of converting them to clean share classes. Speaking at the Personal Finance Society annual conference in Birmingham last week, Transact head of technical services Brian Radbone said while he was not against the idea of clean share classes, there […]


Govt faces backlash over auto-enrol active member discount ban

Hargreaves Lansdown has questioned whether pensions minister Steve Webb will be able to deliver on his threat to ban active member discounts for automatic enrolment. Last month, the Department for Work and Pensions proposed banning AMDs for auto-enrolment from April 2014. Aviva head of pensions, policy and investments John Lawson claimed the market will “grind to […]

India GDP surprise

By Kunal Desai, head of Indian Equities, Neptune Kunal Desai, manager of the Neptune India Fund, comments on the strength of India’s latest GDP figures. Click here for more Important Information Investment risks The Neptune India Fund may have a high volatility rating and past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Must agree, our last RMAR on adviser charging was a little in depth shall we say.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm