View more on these topics

Apfa says RMAR reporting costs advisers £10m a year

Chris-Hannant-2012-700x450.jpg
Apfa policy director Chris Hannant

The Association of Professional Financial Advisers has warned advisers are spending three working days a year meeting regulatory reporting requirements at a total industry cost of over £10m a year.

It says it is concerned about how much time advisers have to spend in complying with retail mediation activity return requirements, given the impact of the RDR and the wider economic environment on adviser revenues.

Policy director Chris Hannant says: “We support a drive towards greater transparency, but this will not be achieved by the unthinking collection or publication of more and more data with no clear aim. We need to be sure that what the FCA is asking advisers to provide is used by the FCA, especially given the time it takes to compile the information.” 

From July, advisers will be required to complete more detailed information in their RMAR. Two new sections, K and L, will require firms to collect data on adviser charging and consultancy charging.

Section K requires firms to provide details of initial and ongoing charges, and “regular instalments as a proportion of the total due”.

Charges information will need to be split according to whether advice is independent or restricted, and whether the cost of advice is billed directly to clients or facilitated through providers or platforms.

Back office software providers have warned about these increased requirements for advisers.

Intelliflo marketing director Peter Jordan says: “It is clearly a large increase in the amount of information advisers have to supply and in order for advisers to make sure they provide the right information to the FCA, they are going to need a system which can complete this information efficiently and with the least amount of constraint on their time.”

Thomas and Thomas Financial Services managing director Darren Lloyd Thomas says: “Apfa may have underestimated the time it takes, I would say advisers are losing two weeks a year completing these returns.” 

Recommended

Comment of the week: The real competition to protection

Reading the comments following the article I can see unfortunately once again the market reacting against anyone trying to move protection in the right direction. 61 per cent of families in the UK have no protection in place – is that a resounding triumph for the way in which protection has been sold in the […]

2

Apfa appoints Chris Hannant as director general

Apfa has appointed policy director Chris Hannant as its new director general. Hannant joined the trade body in January 2012 and has since overseen the rebrand from Aifa, supported advisers through RDR implementation and the transition to the Financial Conduct Authority. His appointment as director general is effective immediately. Apfa chairman Lord Deben says: “Chris […]

How can I help develop my professional connections?

Graeme Ballantyne, business consultancy manager, looks at how you can maximise the opportunities through your professional connections As we move through the summer months it’s perhaps a good time to pause and reflect on whether the plans you’ve made for your business are bearing fruit. One area we at PruConsulting know many advisers have been […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Julian Stevens 11th June 2013 at 8:33 pm

    So what happened to any sort of Cost:Benefit Analysis? Or consultation? Conveniently ignored, as usual.

    In principle, it’s not unreasonable for the regulator to want to know what’s going on out here, but the requirements of the GABRIEL Returns in their present format go way beyond what could be described as reasonable.

    Whatever happened to a risk-based, targeted and proportionate approach to regulation? Why is the FCA allowed a handy exemption from having to observe any of those considerations?

Leave a comment