View more on these topics

Apfa: FCA is fighting a losing battle on client comms

CarolineEscott

Last month, the FCA published a discussion paper on smarter consumer communications, complete with an interactive page on its website and several examples of what it considers to be best practice.

The paper states, quite reasonably, that information can “overwhelm, confuse, distract or even deter people from making effective choices”, using behavioural economics to explain why consumers can make poor financial decisions. It is wide-ranging and states its aim is to help firms move away from “the paper-based mind-set” and towards more innovative techniques.

It has long been recognised by advisers that presenting clients with a mountain of paperwork can be off-putting, costly and inimical to consumer engagement. From Key Investment Information Documents to suitability reports that aim to produce an accurate record of the conversation, as well as minimise the possibility of any future claims, there is a dizzyingly large amount of documentation awaiting clients.

But while the paper places the onus squarely on firms to use new technology to better communicate with consumers, it does not tackle what is perhaps the root of the problem: the excessive burden of regulatory requirements, systems and approaches at both the UK and EU level.

The regulator is keen to stress that suitability reports, for instance, need not be cumbersome, while expressing its dismay at the fact some seen were around 90 pages long. It says suitability reports are merely required to focus on the client objectives, why a particular course of action is suitable for a given client and the possible disadvantages and risks.

Although it appears there are officials at the FCA who sincerely believe this, a lack of a “long-stop” and the perceived unfairness of decision-making at the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme cannot help but create a framework that incentivises the noting-down of every possible detail by advisers.

A related point is the sheer number of different disclosure documents required by various EU and UK regulations and handbook codes, which, on occasion, overlap and even conflict with each other. It is clear that a well-regulated sector is in the interest of consumers and advisers alike but it is arguable that the UK advice industry is not well regulated, with an opt-out for financial regulation from the Government’s Better Regulation programme.

In addition to feeding in positive examples of best practice and innovation, advisers should seek to use this discussion paper as an opportunity to spark a debate surrounding what rules should be “slashed and burned” to ease the regulatory burden.

This could also be combined with a similar approach towards the FCA’s call for input on regulatory barriers to innovation in digital and mobile solutions, which is also currently open.

It is obvious that better, smarter consumer communications that inform without overwhelming would help consumers and advisers alike. Now it has been a few months since the UK general election, hopefully it is not too optimistic to see the FCA as in listening mode and taking the first step on the path to better, smarter financial regulation.

Caroline Escott is senior policy adviser at Apfa

Recommended

Lloyds’ mortgage lending dives 19%

Lloyds Banking Group lent 19.1 per cent less to mortgage borrowers in the first half of the year than it did in the first half of 2014. Its half-year report, published today, shows the group lent £16bn to borrowers in the first six months of the year, down from £19.8bn in the same period last […]

The Natixis Solution: H2O MultiReturns Fund

A product designed to bring some unique attributes to the crowded absolute return global macro space With diversification and risk management top of investors’ wish lists when it comes to alternatives, step forward the H2O MultiReturns Fund. H2O Asset Management is an independent boutique backed by Natixis Global Asset Management and has a 14-year track […]

Pensions - thumbnail

Preparing for the changes to the pensions market

As more and more providers start to reveal their stance on the charge cap and removal of commission and active member discount pricing, we thought it would be worthwhile to look at what these are, and the steps businesses should be taking to prepare for this.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 6 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Since when did the FCA ever listen to anything we have to say?

  2. Douglas Baillie 3rd August 2015 at 4:20 pm

    APFA is correct. Advisers are fearful of unfair FOS decisions and therefore cram everything and anything into client reports in case an over enthusiastic FOS adjudicator leaps on to a single omission to pronounce guilt. The entire FOS methodology appears to be severely biased and is set up to find in favour of the complainer and only to look for evidence that supports their predetermined conclusion.

  3. It’s obviously not occurred to the FCA that all the information in its 10,000 page rule book may well overwhelm, confuse, distract or even prevent advisers from making effective choices as to what they should include in their suitability reports.

    I think most of us regard Rory Percival’s suggestions about concise suitability reports with the scorn they deserve. An interesting exercise would be for Mr P to write one of his concise reports and, without knowing its author, for a compliance inspector to offer his views on it. Equally interesting would be the verdict of an FOS adjudicator on the same report when considering a complaint from a fictitious client claiming that it failed to mention certain key elements that, had they been included, would have changed his mind about proceeding.

  4. “It says suitability reports are merely required to focus on the client objectives, why a particular course of action is suitable for a given client and the possible disadvantages and risks.”

    If this is an accurate reflection of the FCA’s position then that explains why some suitability letters are 90 pages long. In fact they should be longer. The list of “possible disadvantages and risks” is infinite. The only reason suitability letters aren’t much much longer is because IFAs risk the wrath of the FOS by only printing the most obvious ones.

    • And right there Sascha, is the nonsense of it all !

      Not one of us knows, truly, if a suitability letter would stack up to scrutiny from the FCA, FOS or any-one for that matter until the time of a complaint !

      And I personally think its wrong for the likes of Mr P (as Julian calls him) to imply otherwise.

      At a time like this, I remember a bit of advice from a barrister friend of mine ” a hand shake agreement isn’t worth the paper its written on”………………… much like any suitability report I fear.

  5. I was told by an “expert” compliance person to write the usual full suitablity report which the client probably would not read, or if they did not understand, and put a one page exec summary as page one on the basis that they would probably read this and undertand it Hey Ho

Leave a comment