View more on these topics

FCA to review risky assets next year

Andrew-Bailey-BBA-Conference-2012-700x450.jpgA senior member of the FCA has told MPs it will review non-standard assets next year.

FCA director of life insurance and financial advice Deborah Jones was part of a panel giving evidence to the work and pensions select committee.

Currently the committee is looking into the issue of contingent fees and charging for pension transfer advice where the level of charges paid to advisers is dependent on the recomendation given.

Jones was asked about the progress of the FCA’s supervisory work on Sipps.

Last October the watchdog wrote a Dear CEO letter sent to Sipp operators to draw attention to High Court claims against Sipp providers Berkeley Burke and Carey Pensions.

On the same day as this letter was sent the High Court published a landmark ruling where Berkeley Burke lost its case against the Financial Ombudsman Service which it is currently appealing.

Money Marketing reported about the data request that followed the watchdog’s Dear CEO letter that asked Sipp providers to give information about their business activity.

When asked about the work Jones said: “We wrote the [Dear CEO] letter and followed up with phone calls to all the relevant firms and some site visits in appropriate cases. There is ongoing activity with the firms where we are not satisfied they are in the right space to ensure they are in a better financial state to protect consumers in the event claims need to be made.

“I would also flag in cases where an adviser has suggested a client put money with the Sipp operator there are potentially two parties at fault and we would have to look at that in the round. This is one of the angles we are aware of.

“Looking at high risk investments and if advisers are taking an appropriate approach is a piece of work we have got planned for next year.”

FCA chief executive Andrew Bailey (pictured) was also asked about the answers the FCA has received about the ability of Sipp providers to pay out compensation for any potential claims.

He said: “In all honesty the jury is out in the sense the message clearly got home because we got some very clear responses but the jury is out in terms of the practice of [Sipp providers].

“The Sipp industry has evolved in the last six, seven to eight years with one part being for high net worth individuals and the other for people with much less income who are solely relying on the Sipp.

“I think we [the FCA] have had to catch up with that evolution because it has caused practices to happen which have been of definite detriment to people. We have had to clamp down very hard on the practice of putting risky investments into Sipps.”

The watchdog also said it has 10 dedicated staff working on pension scams but this might increase in the future if appropriate.

The regulator also said it is investing in technology to improve data collection so respond more nimbly to problems.

FCA executive director of strategy and competition Chris Woolard said: “Regarding investment in technology, the first pilot of this data collection is for Sipp operators that might be doing bad things in this space and the second area is around phoenixing where advisers go bust, resurface and how we trace them through a complex web of companies.”

Last December Money Marketing revealed the FCA is setting up a central database on firms involved in defined benefit transfers to help it monitor the sector better.



FOS Sipp complaints jump again

The Financial Ombudsman Service has reported yet another spike in Sipp complaints. Latest data from the adjudicator shows that in the quarter to December last year, FOS received 1,029 new enquiries about Sipps, up from 777 in the previous quarter. The number of new cases it took on was 1,047, up from 826 in the […]


Sipp provider to appeal FOS court victory

Embattled Sipp provider Berkeley Burke is appealing a ruling saying it failed to vet unregulated investments for one of its clients. Last year, the High Court heard a judicial review in a longstanding dispute between Berkeley Burke Sipp Administration and the Financial Ombudsman Service. In the judicial review Judge Jacobs upheld a 2014 FOS decision […]


FOS backs claimants against embattled Sipp provider

The Financial Ombudsman Service has issued several preliminary decisions in favour of three claimants who invested more than £36,000 into the Ethical Forestry scheme through Liberty Sipp. The investments were made after being approached by introducer Avacade, which cold called the clients and discussed moving their pensions with them. The FOS adjudicator finds Liberty Sipp […]

The future of active management is now

Fees under pressure. Regulatory moves against closet indexers. Rapid advances in financial technology. Shifting sentiment among investors. Such mounting challenges have led to widespread speculation about active management’s shrinking future. But a closer look inside intelligent portfolio construction today tells a story of expanding roles, added value, and innovative risk-adjusted, lower-cost solutions. Four investment experts […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. So another year of unregulated investments being allowed to be sold via SIPP’s to benefit fraudsters. £197 million last year, how big does this figure have to get before action is put at the top of the regulators List.

    Yet again admitting they are behind the curve, and in the same breath deferring the review another twelve months, which means most likely three to four years before anything happens. When the regulator wants an adviser to look at something they are given a few days, a few weeks at most. I wonder, if when asked to look at an area of business an advisers response was, yes, I will do it next year?

    • Prioritisation, as we know, has never been the FCA’s forte. And anyway, at this late stage in the game, what difference are a few more train wrecks likely to make? There’s always the FSCS.

      • “Currently the committee is looking into the issue of contingent fees – charging for pension transfer advice – that is paid to advisers, irrespective of how suitable their financial advice is”.

        That’s a interesting description of contingent fees!

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm