Allianz Global Investors has launched a performance fee structure on five of its UK funds in response to the competition with passive providers and an increasing transparency clampdown.
The ‘outperformance fee’ share class will charge a fixed fee of 20 basis points and a performance fee of 20 per cent that will apply only if the fund beats its benchmark.
If the fund’s overall performance has been positive, at the end of the year the company will be paid the total performance fee accrued during the period.
If the fund undeperforms, the performance will be recorded on a daily basis and reduce the charge. But if the fund underperforms the benchmark overall at the end of the year, clients will only pay the fixed 20bps.
There will be no additional costs other than the 20bps on the fund, while the maximum period of underperformance of the fund is set at 5 years.
The UK active funds with the share class using the new fee structure will be:
- Allianz Best Styles Global AC Equity
- Allianz Emerging Markets Equity
- Allianz Global AC Equity Insights
- Allianz UK-Mid Cap
- Allianz UK Opportunities
Allianz GI, which manages €498bn (£433.5bn) globally, already applies a performance fee with a “fulcrum” structure on three of its US funds. The asset manager is currently holding discussions with US regulators to introduce the new outperformance fee to other US funds.
The company said it took six years to work on the new pricing model which included various consultations with the FCA to agree to the model.
Speaking at a press conference, Allianz GI chief executive and chief investment officer Andreas Utermann, who has been at the helm of the firm since 2015, said the FCA was eventually “pleased” with the new model and said the regulator was “comfortable” with the final decision.
Utermann said the FCA wanted to make sure the fund objectives were aligned with the new fee structure.
“This is the clarity the FCA has been looking for [in the asset management industry],” Utermann said, referring to the regulator’s damning review of the sector.
He added: “A lot of people said with [the performance fee] there is a risk of cannibalism. There are two triggers for launching a performance fee; you realise that somebody is eating your lunch and you also realise that the active industry is stuck to a pricing model which is not responding to what clients want.”
Architas investment director Adrian Lowcock says the new model looks like “a classic performance fee” but is only in line with what most clients would expect.
He says: “It is good to see these innovations, but is it just making this more complicated for investors? It seems quite hard to explain to investors. If you charge performance fees to beat the benchmark, that is your job so it feels like you are charging a fee to do your job. I would rather expect a fee to come in with an additional outperformance [level].”
In October, Fidelity International said it will introduce a fulcrum fee whereby the manager will charge a higher fee when it delivers outperformance net of fees, but will be lower if performance meets or is below the benchmark.
US manager AllianceBernstein also plans to roll out a new performance