View more on these topics

Alistair Cunningham: Why I’m coming round to new pension freedoms


Two months ago, in these pages, I wrote how pension freedom would penalise most pension savers in the UK. An increase in pension fund taxation (£3bn over the next five years), depletion of pensions savings, product innovation and the compounding effect of further complication are all risks. But with the sight of new rules in this past week I can consider my clients with a feeling of positivity.

Pension savings will continue to be the single most tax-efficient investment an individual can accrue in their lifetime. No other asset offers tax-free savings, avoiding income tax, corporation tax and both flavours of National Insurance.

Funds grow virtually free of income and capital gains tax. Inheritance tax exemption applies on most death benefits and as bona fide income, gifts can normally be made in retirement without any seven-year potentially exempt transfer clock ticking, as long as they are regular and do not affect one’s standard of living. The previous explicit agreement that tax reliefs came at the expense of pension freedoms has now been torn up.

All of which is great for planners. Financial planning has arguably been about achieving client objectives in the most tax-efficient ways and we have more ways of juggling many options while mitigating the four major taxes: income tax (including National Insurance), capital gains tax, inheritance tax and corporation tax.

If a client is prudent enough to have engaged a financial planner, they are unlikely be looking to squander their retirement pot. And an individual who may have avoided pension savings fearing reduced access will be more likely to save.

The rules proposed for the mitigation of abuse seem reasonable and proportionate. Clients will be able to supplement employment income for years while still avoiding 40 per cent income tax by saving to pensions and drawing tax-free lump sums or non-flexible annuity purchase (my term to differentiate from the new varieties proposed), both of which are excluded from triggering  reduction of the annual allowance to £10,000.

I am ambivalent to the guidance guarantee. Guidance is not a threat to meaningful, detailed holistic advice. The current position, where decisions are mind-blowingly complicated and the ‘bad’ option (not exercising open market options) is the simplest default, will hopefully be eroded. If we do not like guidance we should be lobbying the institutions which have created a world where pensioners cannot shop around. 

Banning defined benefit transfers would have been a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Transferring is still likely to be the wrong thing for most but those in very poor health or other rarer situations should be entitled to spend their funds as they wish. 

The reduction from 55 per cent income tax on death is a small but welcome change. Most widows or widowers may still prefer to annuitise on first death but it will be good to be rid of this current strange penalty on crystallisation.

There is work to be done before April 2015 and many of us will recall the changes proposed – then changed – in 2005/06. This time there is too much at stake for the Government and we should treat this as the most positive time in pensions and financial planning history.

Alistair Cunningham is financial planning director at Wingate Financial Planning



How will Govt close new pensions recycling loophole?

The Government could be forced to cut the annual allowance to £10,000 for people who buy an annuity in order to close a potential tax loophole. Yesterday, HMRC published draft tax rules to accompany Chancellor George Osborne’s radical Budget reforms. As well as allowing people to access their entire pot without tax penalties from age […]

Poyntz-Wright-Nick-FCA-2013 500 x 320.jpg

FCA waters down Sipp cap ad proposals

The FCA has softened its proposed approach to increasing capital adequacy requirements for Sipp operators after concerns were raised about the impact its original formula would have on small firms. The new cap ad regime, which will come into force in September 2016, will mean the amount of capital a Sipp provider is required to […]


FCA fails to monitor compliance guarantees

Lawyers have raised concerns the FCA is not monitoring its use of attestations among small firms. An attestation is written confirmation by a senior individual that a firm is meeting certain regulatory requirements, usually following a thematic review or supervisory action. The aim is to ensure the firm can be held accountable if the problems […]


MM leader: Handle DB transfers advice with care

When the Government issued its Freedom and Choice in Pensions consultation response last month, the initial clamour inevitably focused on the fact that advisers look set to pay a sizeable chunk towards Chancellor George Osborne’s guidance guarantee. But another significant development contained within the document has received scant coverage in comparison. This is the Government’s […]

IHT: What were you doing in 2009?

One of the best sources of new business is your existing clients and, if they are estate planning clients, regular reviews are needed because people’s inheritance tax (IHT) problems tend to only get worse. Now, not a lot of things remain at the same rate as in 2009. If we turn the clock back, it […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Freddie Findlater 5th August 2014 at 9:35 am

    Great article as always Alistair!

  2. Excellent article and I concur entirely. There will be a lot who use the guidance however they are probably those who would not have used advisers anyway so that is not any threat. Like most if not all advisers in the country it is the thought that we are going to have to pay for the guidance to be delivered and that sticks in the throat. More so because whilst the powers to be have suggested we pay 30% of the bill, we don not yet know what the final ongoing bill will be so once again it is open cheque book time and as always it will be clients who foot the bill ultimately as I for one, am not taking the hit. Still – opportunity knocks for sure

  3. I agree with Alan & Marty.

Leave a comment