View more on these topics

Alistair Cunningham: The quest for decent feedback


It is common for service oriented firms to request feedback. Over the past week I have been contacted both my mobile phone provider and the company servicing my car. I rarely respond, and do not appreciate the invasive phone calls, emails or text messages. I imagine I am not alone in this.

I was broadly satisfied with my car’s service and did not respond but I did provide feedback to the phone company. Its request came in the form of a text message questionnaire, which explained it would be in three parts.

This overcame an initial obstacle – convenience – as I happened to be on a train. On reflection, this was still a waste of time – it scored zero across the board and has made no effort to resolve my dissatisfaction.

We encourage and receive feedback from clients, both those who have bought a service either as a one-off or ongoing, and at the annual review. This feedback is almost universally positive, but in some respects this misses the point of asking for feedback in the first place.

So why ask? In many cases, particularly from a financial services perspective, we may be ensuring that the minimum level of service has been supplied, for example was the client notified of fees in advance, did they receive a business card and client agreement? Did the adviser do the job that the client and firm would expect them to do?

I would argue this is not valuable feedback, as it merely covers a hygiene level of satisfaction. Firms should be quick to respond to dissatisfaction and it is useful to know that advisers are performing compliantly. Feedback also allows firms to be confident there are no trends of bad client outcomes.

But could firms be missing an opportunity – a deep understanding of the clients who are content-to-happy, but with scope to be much more?

Given strong relationships with clients, they may be less likely to give valuable feedback. If they think we are failing in minor ways that could be addressed, we should encourage them to provide honest feedback.

Like my issue with my telecoms provider, I often wonder about the feedback that we do not get. A client who is strongly aggrieved, or (hopefully) passionately enthusiastic about our firm, is likely to provide feedback. How do we encourage the clients who have been marginally happy? Or those that have niggling worries that could develop into significant concerns over time?

I do not know of a suitable tool which could collect feedback in a more valuable fashion but the first step in seeking feedback is explaining clearly the benefits to the client, firm and the firm’s other clients. It should be anonymous and questions should be phrased in a non-leading way. Methods should be in place to follow up feedback for those who do not provide it – is it because they are marginally happy or marginally dissatisfied or are they unhappy with, for example, online questionnaires or other methods of communication?

Best practice can be improved. Businesses fail to identify small niggles before they develop into bigger concerns.

Financial services is famously mooted as being about trust and value, and having read some of the ‘science’ in this area I believe feedback is the route to fulfil the majority of clients’ needs in a sustainable way.

Alistair Cunningham is financial planning director at Wingate Financial Planning



Platforms and VCTs in talks ahead of nominee changes

Platforms and venture capital trusts are holding talks to pave the way for VCTs to be made available on platforms. In the Autumn Statement this month, the Government announced it will change the rules to allow investors to subscribe for VCTs through nominees such as platforms. Transact chief executive Ian Taylor says the firm is interested in […]


Tom McPhail: FSCP annuities report did more harm than good

Last week the Financial Services Consumer Panel published some research into the annuity market. I have very mixed feelings about this, as they have generated momentum for improvements in the market, however they also failed to focus on the two most important failures in the retirement system. As a consequence they may actually have done […]


FCA cuts fees for consumer credit licences

The FCA has revised charges for consumer credit licences, with the minimum charge for full authorisation falling from £1,000 to £600. The regulator previously published its consultation into consumer credit licences in November which stated application fees would be divided into four categories: straightforward cases costing up to £1,000; moderately complex cases up to £5,000; complex […]

Seeking quality in uncertain markets

By Ewan McAlpine, Senior Client Portfolio Manager In uncertain times, investors naturally seek safety. But in fixed income markets, what does that really mean? Ewan McAlpine outlines the approach RLAM’s Fixed Income Team will be adopting across its credit funds in response to potentially volatile markets this year. Click here for full article


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm