View more on these topics

Aifa wants to know legal basis for levy

’Regulator should have stepped in far sooner’

Aifa has called on the Financial Services Compensation Scheme to reveal the legal advice it received which led to investment advisers being saddled with the £43m Keydata levy.

It says the FSCS has confirmed it sought legal advice before allocating the costs of Keydata claims to the investment intermediation sub-class. Aifa says it is “imperative” this advice is published.

The FSCS has so far refused to say if it will publish the advice, although legal experts suggest it is unlikely to agree to Aifa’s request. Legal professional privilege protects the disclosure of certain communications between lawyer and client but this can be waived if it is deemed in the public interest.

Aifa is examining the competition implications of the levy and continues to challenge the decision, believing the fund management sub-class should shoulder the burden.

It believes a challenge could be brought against the FSA on the grounds of evidence of “a mindset of reckless indifference” within the regulator.
Due to their size, the majority of IFA firms will pay a levy far less than the average being paid by the 6,500 firms hit with the £70m levy for Keydata and failed stockbrokers Pacific Continental and Square Mile.

The amount payable will depend on levels of investment business written but Aifa calculations indicate the likely cost will be around £1,100 per full investment adviser. For a typical member, where investment exposure constitutes 40 per cent of business, it will be around £440.

Aifa director general Chris Cummings says: “We still believe this is a regulatory and supervisory failure, with Keydata inappropriately authorised by the FSA.

“In similarity to other recent failures, such as Pacific Continental Securities and Square Mile, Aifa believes the regulator should have stepped in far sooner.”

City law firm CMS Cameron McKenna partner Simon Morris says: “The FSCS will have taken very detailed legal advice before it proceeded to impose any part of the Keydata levy on intermediaries. If it is exceeding its powers, it is open to challenge. If it has acted lawfully, it would be exceedingly unlikely that any claim can be raised against the FSA.”

Conservative Shadow Treasury Financial Secretary Mark Hoban says: “People need to debate the levy and how it is funded. People need to think about the long-term implications and that is a debate people need with the regulator.”

Recommended

Vision in focus

How many firms are clear about what they offer clients and why they should be their adviser of choice? Take time to sit back with the key people in your company and create your business vision

RoyLon back in talks on deal with Royal Liver

Royal London is in talks to buy Royal Liver two years after the Liverpool-based insurer rejected a merger deal. A Royal London spokesman confirms that discussions are taking place between the two firms but says they are at an early stage. The news follows talks between LV= and Royal Liver last autumn about a potential […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Incompetent Regulators Awards Team 25th February 2010 at 10:22 am

    We all know there was no legal advice supporting giving teh IFAs a good kicking. Otherwise they would produce it. Again regulators working in secret as their incompetency reaches new levels.

  2. What is Mark Hoban talking about?
    which people need to debate with the regulator? Does he seriously think the fsa enter into any meaningful discussions with IFAs? Just another politician who has no idea of the misery caused through being misregulated by a fat cat quango that has no idea of the repercussions such an unfair levy will cause.This is a regulator of unintended consequences, that is only able to regulate in hindsight and then expects everyone else to foot the bill.
    If you are expecting the tories to deliver us from the fsa after an election, think again.

Leave a comment