View more on these topics

Aifa wants Limitation Act to apply

IFAs advising clients on transactions without ongoing charges should have significantly reduced potential liabilities, says Aifa.

In the RDR, the FSA will introduce ongoing charges that can only be levied when advisers provide ongoing service, except for regular-contribution investments.

The statute of limitations gives consumers six years after purchasing a product to complain, or three years after they have identified a latent, or unapparent, defect. Aifa director general Chris Cummings says advisers should fall under these rules if clients choose to pay only for a one-off transaction or if ongoing charges cease. He says: “If the client severs the relationship with the IFA after a transaction, then the client has refused an ongoing service. The adviser would have no access to the client records needed to ensure the advice remains app- ropriate in the future.

“This is a fundamental shift in adviser responsibility and moves the game along considerably. If the FSA does not mean for this change to be the case, then it will have to state that.”

Bill Warren Compliance managing director Bill Warren says: “If a client makes a decision not to take ongoing advice, then it would be grossly unfair to hold an adviser responsible for their ongoing financial position.”


The time of day

I hear on the grapevine that day trading which gripped a nation a decade ago is in the ascendancy again. The technology boom was fuelled by every man and his dog buying shares in companies that were supposedly going to make them bucketloads of cash in an instant.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. It does apply
    It’s only the F-pack that thinks it doesn’t and tries to bamboozle those who left the indsutry prior to FSMA in to paying out due to the inequality of info available to them and retired advisers.
    Not one new adviser agreed to the removal of the longstop that I am aware of and to me that is as good as a fraudulent attack on my personal wellbeing and Human Rights and I will fight to defend my Human Rights with all legal means.
    For the record, my firm has had complaints, I just object to removal of a right of defence which occurred without my knowledge or agreement.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm