View more on these topics

Aifa wants basic benchmark

Aifa director general Chris Cummings is disappointed that the basic advice category is exempt from QCF level-four qualifications and adviser charging rules.

Cummings says that it should not be up to the customer to second-guess what qualifications they can expect from such advisers.

He says: “If you are sitting in front of a client offering advice, it is not for the client to try to second-guess what level of qualification or professionalism that you have or how you are going to get paid.

“Everything should operate on the same benchmark, no matter what type of adviser you are. QCF level four and adviser charging should apply right down to the basic level.”

Cummings adds that more work is needed to ensure that basic advice helps the millions of people who are currently under-advised.

“Basic advice works for certain people but it is not the great leap forward to serving the majority of the population who are left under-advised at the moment.

“I think we need to do some more work around simplified advice. The FSA should look at similar models in Italy, France and Germany where they have the Mifid regime but seem to cope better with a more simplified sales process.”

Cummings is broadly supportive of most of the RDR’s proposals claiming they show the FSA has listened to the IFA community’s views.

He adds that the workplace assessments will stave off a mass exodus of advisers from the industry.

He says: “Restricted advice paints such a clear picture for consumers. If that is not a clear blue flashing warning light to consumers then I am not sure what else the FSA can do. A lot of this is how it gets supervised and translated into action but, in terms of setting the ground rules, I do not think the FSA could have found a better word than restricted to differentiate from independent.

Recommended

Health - thumbnail

Absence management systems gone AWOL from UK’s SMEs, reports Jelf

A quarter (23 per cent)* of the UK’s small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) do not have an absence management system in place, according to new research from Jelf Employee Benefits. Despite 69 per cent* of organisations having a system in place, three-quarters (75 per cent) report that it is not providing them with sufficiently empowering absence or health data to inform an effective wellbeing programme.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Level Four for all, but not the same subject matter
    Angela Knight from the Bankers Assoc says level 4 for all advice is the right way forward, but that the subjefct matter of level four should match the purpose of the service being provided. This appars to make sense to me as the level of knowledge shoiuld be the same and skill sets similar, but the detail should vary according to what you will do for the client, i.e do certain things and be trained to level four in the right subject matter to know WHEN you need to pass on to someone with levle four in a specific subject that you only have a cursory knowledge of.

Leave a comment