View more on these topics

Advisers wary of platform consolidation as service tops wishlist

Fundsnetwork boss expects pace of consolidation to pick up in coming years

Advisers believe platform market will undergo consolidation as smaller platforms fail to reach scale and are unable to stay profitable.

Fidelity-owned platform Fundsnetwork polled 220 advisers, 83 per cent of which expect the platform market to consolidate over the next few years.

Advisers also said that having too many platforms in the market would be a driver of consolidation.

Advisers were asked what they thought the key factors for a platform to be successful in the current environment are, with 69 per cent saying service and support was most important.

Usability and functionality was seen as being a key factor by 63 per cent of those surveyed while 42 per cent thought the platform’s ability to invest and develop would be critical to its ongoing success.

Fundsnetwork head Pat Shea says: “With the platform market expanding rapidly over the past 15 years or so, we have now reached the tipping point where there are too many players in the market and consolidation will be inevitable. It’s therefore interesting to see that so many advisory firms recognise and expect this as well.”

Shea adds: “Running and developing a platform so it continues to meet the evolving needs of advisers takes a huge amount of investment and requires platforms to reach sufficient size and scale to be able to keep this up over the long term. With this in mind, I would expect the pace of consolidation to really pick up over the coming years, and we will see the vast majority of advised assets sit with a handful of main players in the market in the future.”

Recommended

Business-Handshake-General-Hire-Appointment-700x450.jpg

Prudential hires former Aegon platform strategy boss

Macari brought in to drive strategy with non-tied advisers at Prudential Prudential has hired former Aegon platform strategy director Lou Macari to work on its distribution strategy with advisers. Macari left Aegon as it completed its acquisition of Cofunds in January. He had been with the provider for five years, and served a 12 year […]

Ian Taylor Transact 440
3

Transact chief Taylor: Advisers shouldn’t pay for platforms

Transact chief hits out at argument all platforms are the same and the market’s focus on price Though usually unflappable, there are several things currently bothering Transact chief executive Ian Taylor. One is the fact the term “platform” is not well defined, especially because not all platforms are the same. This is of particular note with […]

China: growth defence or another debt-fuelled boom?

By Douglas Turnbull, Head of Chinese Equities at Neptune Following recent stimulus efforts from Beijing, Neptune’s Douglas Turnbull examines how the government’s long-term reform agenda can be balanced with supporting growth and addressing structural challenges, and the investment opportunities arising from this.Click here to read more Important information: Investment Risks Neptune funds may have a […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Want great service, all the wrappers and any fund in a competitive charging structure?

    Just use Transact

  2. How this consolidation will happen. Will they include platforms solely owned by insurers who are producers as well. Example Skandia investment solutions. Will this be achieved buying of smaller platforms by bigger ones? Or one or more platforms will get consolidated keeping their individual identities like web aggregator

  3. Whilst I expect concentration to occur over the years ahead, integration following consolidation requires a huge amount of work even when they are on the same software. As such, those consolidating require sufficient individual scale to warrant it. As such I would expect the consolidation to occur with the big players in the market (the FM/life cos) and the smaller ones will either fail or continue to chip away. Only those profitable will last, so advisers should rightfully be wary of platforms in this situation and will in itself result in these providers failing to last.

    Transact, AJBell, Nucleus and to a lesser extent Parmenion are probably the best placed of the non-life cos to succeed in the years ahead.

    To be clear, I don’t think all the big FM/Life cos will in the market. Whilst alot some have real scale and can afford to lose money due to making profits elsewhere, this can only last so long before the business questions the benefit of that distribution channel.

  4. @Bob
    Why on earth would you say “and to a lesser extent Parmenion”? We find Parmenion technologically adept, friendly, efficient, prompt in their actions, willing to listen and change, competitive in their pricing and absolutely wonderful in their online submission of new business and the quality, clarity and transparency within their new Client documentation.

Leave a comment