View more on these topics

Advisers question PFS plan for free financial healthcheck

Financial advice-planning-advice-cashflow-analysis

Advisers have questioned whether they have the capacity to take on free financial healthcheck sessions and whether they would attract any valuable enquiries.

In its response to the Government’s public financial guidance consultation, the Personal Finance Society proposed every working adult in the UK be given a voucher for a financial healthcheck session with an adviser, the cost of which could be partially deducted from the adviser’s next FCA levy.

The “qualified guidance” session could either be face-to-face or over the telephone and would result in a summary of options that might include full advice.

Chartered Insurance Institute policy and research head Laurence Baxter says: “There are a lot of advisers who already give an introductory session to customers. Perhaps the new financial guidance body could play a role in helping connect customers with those advisers who are willing to give that initial consultation, and do it in a way that would provide not just a signpost, but a filtering service.”

While many advisers like the idea in principle, there are concerns about whether firms would be interested in signing up for it.

Plan Money director Peter Chadborn says: “We are very busy, we do not need new enquiries but they happen anyway and we can just about deal with what we are getting. We wouldn’t be inclined to sign up for something like this, not because we wouldn’t want to support it but because we don’t have
the capacity.”

Chadborn predicts large advice firms would be more likely to have the resources to handle increased demand for guidance sessions.

Aspect8 chartered financial planner Claire Walsh says making sessions free may not attract many new clients to advisers.

She says: “I just see it as a marketing exercise because it is not dissimilar to what Unbiased do. I don’t think people will suddenly think, ‘I’ve got this voucher, I can get free advice’. Most people expect a free initial consultation with an adviser, that is not what is stopping people.”

Both Walsh and Chadborn also question if the service would attract customers that are usually in advisers’ target market.

Chadborn says: “It is also the type of enquiries. It is true most advisers will offer their first meeting at no cost to the client. You also position your services to attract a certain demographic of client, typically.”

Baxter says the idea of a voucher and a potential rebate for advisers that provide the service is still in its infancy and there could be other options outside reducing FCA levies.

He says: “Wouldn’t it be efficient if those advisers who spent 45 minutes on that session got remunerated for that session? They might not get back the full value but they should get something for what they are doing.

“We have pencilled in the suggestion of taking some proportion of the levy due and getting it rebated somehow but that is detail that could be easily agreed at a later point. The point we are trying to make is it should be considered and we should have a debate about it.”

Chadborn, and other advisers on Money Marketing’s website are keen to know what might happen to advisers’ regulatory fees if they do not take part in the service.

He says: “If x per cent of FCA levies comes from the adviser comm-unity and those that participate in the scheme get a discount, does that mean the rest of us that don’t participate have to make up that shortfall?

“I would like to see it continue to be debated because it is a good initiative in principle but there would need to be a lot more clarity around these points.”

Recommended

13

PFS proposes voucher system for free sessions with advisers

The Personal Finance Society wants every working adult in the UK to be given a voucher for a financial “health check” session with an adviser, the cost of which could be partially deducted from their next FCA levy. The PFS says the “qualified guidance” session could either be face-to-face or over the telephone and would result […]

36

Nick Bamford: I’m throwing down the gauntlet on value of advice

I would like to take the pricing debate to the next level. With the backing of Money Marketing, I am proposing a reader competition to demonstrate what it is advisers actually do for their clients, how they price their services and how they add value to their client’s lives. My idea is for readers to write and […]

Streatfield-Malcolm-Lighthouse-2013
1

Lighthouse wins MAS workplace advice contract

Lighthouse Group has been selected by the Money Advice Service to provide regulated financial advice to its staff in a contract running to March 2018. MAS opened the tender up to a pool of around 3,500 firms on its retirement adviser directory. All of those firms could submit expressions of interest, with 50 doing so […]

Unfinished business?

Pension specialist Fiona Tait gives an update on three big announcements from the 2016 Budget – Pensions Advice Allowance (PAA), the Lifetime ISA (LISA) and the pension dashboard. £500 Pensions Advice Allowance What’s new Under current rules it is possible to deduct an adviser charge from a defined contribution pension fund to pay for financial […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Alan S Flinders 6th March 2017 at 12:30 pm

    I doubt many current advisers would have the time or appetite for such a scheme ( some may change their minds if the financial inducement was sufficient ). However this, if successful and the take up is in sufficient numbers, coupled with a drive to bring in new advisers could go some way to solve two issues in one go. The lack of readily available financial advice and the lack of ‘new blood’. Joined up thinking is required to ensure a chance of success.

  2. I am a baby boomer and not a day passes with a moment of stark reality hitting me full on around the perception of millennials that society is failing them.

    Where shall I start?

    Well being born in 1951, I have seen quite a lot. Not as much as some but more than most around lifestyle changes and aspirations from the ‘50’s and ’60’s through until today.

    In the post war era that I grew up in, the idea of family, friends and neighbours being victims of poverty, exposed to dangers various at every turn just did not exist.

    The Thames froze. We had terrible smogs caused by coal fires, houses did not have central heating or double-glazing, toilets were outside the house, Bronco was the paper of choice. We would wake up from a duvet-less sleep in a house with windows frozen on the inside as well as the outside and after being given breakfast it was off to school, with school friends living nearby on foot.

    We played in the street, unthreatened. we knew our neighbours, burglar alarms were only found on banks.

    Buses and trams represented the public transport offering. Milk was delivered by horse and cart, supermarkets did not exist, and food was rationed until 1954.

    Homes that had a telephone would often share the line with someone else. And black and white televisions were tiny and for the rich.

    Police were on the ‘beat’ walking the streets with clean white shirts and a very big hat, the Fire Brigade actually put out fires and ambulances took people (who actually needed to be there) to a clean and very efficient hospital casualty (not A&E) department. The call for emergency help was often made on a shared phone line or by your family doctor, not a GP, if they could not help.

    If you were unemployed, you went to your local ‘Labour Exchange’ and got very little money to help in times of hardship. The credit card did not exist.

    And as for financial advice, the ‘Man from the Pru’ was the ‘come to you’ solution. If you were a person of substance, your bank manager would assist, resplendent in attire and tattoo free.

    Sixty five years on is this the time for a pause to reflect on whether access to financial advice is better or worse in 2017 than it was in the 1950’s?

Leave a comment