View more on these topics

‘IFAs as enablers’: How HMRC will target advisers behind tax avoidance schemes

2094965_HMRC-HM-Revenue-Customs-700x450

HM Revenue & Customs has set out how its plans to impose fines on firms promoting tax avoidance schemes will work in practice.

In a consultation paper on strengthening tax avoidance penalties and deterrents, HMRC includes IFAs within its proposed definition of a tax avoidance “enabler” because it says they can benefit through fees and commissions by marketing avoidance schemes.

The paper discusses penalties for enablers of tax avoidance schemes, with HMRC favouring a model where a penalty of either 100 per cent of the tax evaded, or £3,000, whichever is higher.

Each person found to be enabling tax avoidance would be subject to a penalty in their own right, irrespective of any penalty handed to the individual using a tax avoidance scheme.

The paper says: “For example, if a promoter designs a scheme, engages an IFA to market the scheme for them, and engages the services of lawyers and bankers to facilitate the actual implementation of the scheme, then each of those persons in the supply chain would be subject to a penalty in relation to each person they enabled to implement the defeated arrangements.

“For the promoter this would be every user, but for others it could be a subset of that population because different users may be advised or enabled by different persons in different parts of the supply chain.”

HMRC also suggests advisers subject to the new penalty could also be named to protect taxpayers and deter those considering tax avoidance.

Penalties will be triggered by the arrangement being shut down, rather than being dependent on the scheme’s users being sanctioned.

The consultation says: “Our favoured approach is similar to that introduced in Finance Bill 2016 for offshore evasion, but designed specifically to deal with tax avoidance which HMRC defeats.

“In favouring this approach the Government recognises that careful thought is required where a scheme is widely marketed, as an enabler could have enabled tens or hundreds of people to try to avoid tax and would therefore be subject to the new sanctions in relation to each of those persons.”

The consultation closes on 12 October.

Recommended

Payment-Fine-Currency-Money-700.jpg
17

Advisers face huge fines for promoting tax avoidance schemes

Accountants or advisers who assist in tax avoidance schemes could face fines of 100 per cent of the tax that was avoided under proposed Government rules. According to the BBC, the proposed sanctions include offshore tax havens and it is hoped the suggested measures would identify tax avoidance at the source. Currently people who advise on […]

HM-Treasury-700.png

Alarm raised over ‘exploited’ capital gains tax

The National Audit Office is flagging up “exploited” capital gains tax that is set to cost the Treasury £18bn a year in 2015/16. The NAO’s latest report says that HM Revenue & Customs does not monitor tax relief proportionately. It says: “Given the scale of principal private residence relief, complexity of the rules and lack […]

Life cover for life

Jennifer Gilchrist Proposition Lead – Design, Royal London When someone mentions whole of life plans, most people will think of a niche product that serves as an inheritance tax planning tool for high-net-worth clients. And it’s really not surprising they’ve been pigeonholed in that way because before the arrival of RDR in 2013, that’s more […]

UK policy: Kate Moss and short-termism

“Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels,” said supermodel Kate Moss, who is not often credited for her insights into policy making. Perhaps she should be. In politics, as in matters of diet, the course of action that is the best over the long term is often not the most desirable course of action in the short term. Add the instant gratification of the democratic electoral cycle and, instead of good policy making, you sometimes get the equivalent to a midnight binge in front of the fridge.

Read more


Important information

Investment risks

The value of an investment and any income from it can fall as well as rise and you may not get back the amount originally invested. Forecasts and past performance are not a guide to future performance. Some information and statistical data herein has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable but in no way are warranted by us as to their accuracy or completeness. These are Neptune’s views and as such this document is deemed to be impartial research. We do not undertake to advise you of any change to our views.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. As I posted on the other headline – just advise those rich clients to leave the country. Just like racing drivers and the likes of Phillip Green. There are plenty of attractive venues. Then it is simple. The UK gets no (or very little) tax at all.

  2. so if your accountant advises putting money in an isa or premium bonds or even the lottery is this not avoiding tax in the future? Is it not therefore a tax avoidance scheme?

Leave a comment