View more on these topics

FSCS adviser levy rises to £175m

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has announced it intends to levy  £240m on life and pensions intermediaries this year, of which financial advisers will pay £175m.

The levy follows comments made by the lifeboat fund’s outgoing chief executive, Mark Neale, that pension transfers and high-risk advice on Sipps were putting increased pressure on the scheme.

In its 2019 budget published this morning, the FSCS determined the levy on the life and pensions intermediation class, largely made up of advice firms, should be set at £240m.

Providers will contribute £65m towards those fees under new rules revealed last May.

The FSCS says: “[We] continue to receive significant numbers of claims against independent financial advisers regarding advice given to customers to transfer existing pension arrangements into Sipps. The vast majority of these claims relate to advice to invest pension monies into high-risk, non-standard asset classes within a Sipp wrapper.”

Chairman Marshall Bailey reiterated that bad behaviour from firms will keep driving costs up with the risky nature of many investments keeping uphold rates for claimants high.

He says: “Our shadow also extends across the industry itself in the shape of compensation costs, which have risen over recent years – meaning we’ve had to share them across a wider number of firms.

“How much better if stability and confidence were also underpinned by lower rates of firm failure, with FSCS there as a last resort?”

Defined benefit transfers have faced significant scrutiny from both the FSCS and the FCA in the last year.

FSCS boss: We want advisers to think our levies are fair

The lifeboat fund’s November outlook also pointed the finger at cases like the failure of discretionary manager Beaufort Securities, which placed a £10m dent in deficit for the general insurance funding pool last year.

An estimated total £516m in levies is predicted to hit financial services over 2019/20 compared with the £468m levied last year, covering just a nine month period.

Neale says the costs are still “broadly flat in real terms” and could be driven down if companies were more upfront about information needed to process FSCS claims.

He says: “[Pay-out] capacity rests heavily on the quality of information. We often lack, however, equivalent high-quality information when insurance companies and investment firms fail. That compromises our ability to provide prompt protection as we and insolvency practitioners reconstruct records held by brokers and finance companies.

“In particular, it can hold up our preferred approach of applying compensation to the provision of new insurance cover – so securing continuity for consumers – rather than the repayment of premiums.”

The FSCS also used its announcement to drive home its intention to crack down on phoenixing, where firms fold and set up again under a different name leaving liabilities to fall on the lifeboat fund.

The lifeboat fund says it will look to tie information on firms to external data sources to provide regulators with more detailed breakdowns of firms’ conduct.



Which firms are winning the race on wealth management?

Traditional wealth managers have proved themselves to be scalable and profitable businesses despite the hype caused by robo-advice models, analysts say. Wealth managers have also been shown to be more robust than pure asset managers amid mounting pressure on fund performance and fees. While Hargreaves Lansdown and St James’s Place continue to make the headlines […]


UFPLS vs flexi-access drawdown: drawdown wins by a country mile

If there is a straight choice between flexi-access pension drawdown and uncrystallised funds pension lump sum, flexi-access wins by a country mile in virtually every situation. The Treasury prefers to pronounce UFPLS as “uffplus”, presumably because the plus syllable lends a positive quality to this otherwise ridiculous expression. Most pension professionals prefer to pronounce it […]

Are default drawdown pathways a good idea? Industry heavyweights weigh in

With the FCA today setting out new rules for non-advised consumers entering drawdown to make sure they get better outcomes, is the regulator right to set up a number of default investment pathways? Interactive Investor head of personal finance Moira O’Neill Cash is king for a significant number of consumers, but today’s FCA proposals suggest it […]

Gail Counihan

Is the hype around electric vehicles justified?

In order to muscle conventional vehicles off the road and become the dominant technology, electric vehicles need to be able to hold their own in three important ways: performance, practicality and affordability. Gail Counihan, Responsible Investment Analyst at Royal London Asset Management, takes a closer look at these three areas. Read the article here Past […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Apart from the activities of the errant minority of advisers, both the industry and parliament are entitled to demand that the FCA explains why it has failed to regulate the adviser community in a proportionate and appropriately targeted manner such as to reduce significantly the scale of this crisis.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm