View more on these topics

Advisers in dark over new protection CPD requirements

protectAdvisers have criticised the protection industry as many remain in the dark over new continuing professional development requirements for protections sales.

Under the Insurance Distribution Directive, advisers selling protect-ion will need 15 hours of CPD a year to meet the directive’s standards.

These must be specific to the insurance market, claims handling and conflict of interest management.

The requirements apply to both financial planners and other staff involved in selling, or transacting on, insurance contracts for all types of insurance customer.

A Chartered Insurance Institute briefing note from last year suggests that the wording of the rules could extend as far as car dealers, price comparison websites and claims management companies involved with insurance products.

Money Marketing understands that even public relations staff at major providers are having to go through the CPD, but many advisers have said they have received little to no information on what will be required of them.

Is protection compatible with the new look advice profession?

CII director of policy and engagement Matthew Connell says that although the 15 hours do not need to include structured, unstructured or a particular format of CPD, and count as part of advisers’ existing 35-hour requirement, advisers will have to make sure they have covered product specific knowledge and record this appropriately.

He says: “Advisers should be making sure when they plan CPD and record it, they cover off product knowledge for protection…Advisers are doing a lot of what they need to, but need to focus on product knowledges that are a specific requirement of the IDD.

“If you were selling protection, hopefully you have some kind of process for keeping up to date with the products you are selling. It is a fairly broad definition that includes anyone involved in the distribution in a customer facing function, but again, hopefully people are doing ongoing training for their job that includes the IDD requirements.”

Concerns have also been raised over whether the new requirements will increase the protection gap if advisers decide not to undertake
relevant CPD.

At present, the IDD is due to come into force in October 2018, after the European Commission proposed a seven-month delay to the original start date of February this year.

Chapters Financial director Keith Churchouse says he was only made aware of the changes through his compliance consultant, and has not seen any protection provider or industry figures discussing the changes.

He says: “We get a lot of feedback from the protection industry that advisers don’t use them enough, but here’s a good opportunity for them to help advisers in giving them CPD material, and they don’t seem to have grasped that.”

Churchouse has already conducted five hours of relevant CPD and encourages others to get ahead with their requirements.

He says: “I’m pleased to have made a start. You don’t want to get to the end of the CPD year and find out this will be enforced, so why take the risk? If you are a financial planner providing holistic advice, reading around protection for 15 hours won’t do you any harm.”

First Wealth partner Claire Phillips says that networks, which often monitor adviser CPD, have also missed an opportunity to brief their adviser members on new rules that could add to the protection gap if advisers do not understand them.

She says: “I guess everyone has just missed it, but it seems unlike providers to miss an opportunity, they are always knocking on doors to get in front of advisers. I would struggle to see how we would cover 15 hours of straight protection unless we did an exam every year…perhaps we do need packages.

“Fifteen hours sounds like a lot for protection, versus something more complicated like drawdown, where there are no specific or prescriptive requirements.”

Protection Review chief executive Kevin Carr notes that, although advisers attending conferences should pick up plenty of protection CPD hours, providers will likely create more specific offerings in due course.

He says: “It should be relatively easy to do 15 hours in a year, but whether there is much at the moment that is easily available I’m really not sure…they will be planning it but it hasn’t happened yet.”

Underwrite Me head of sales Phil Jeynes hopes more specific CPD will give advisers more confidence to sell protection in greater volumes. He explains: “Most insurers would say they have lots of content on their website that IFAs can access and use towards CPD, but it’s a reasonable challenge to ask why they have not put specific IDD packs together for advisers.

“Our whole thing is trying to make protection easy to sell, so if you are encouraging them to do the CPD, as an integral part of what they do regularly, they will become more expert…It could give them confidence that the process is easy and to get out to consumers with the products.”

A Zurich spokeswoman says: “If the extra CPD requirement improves the quality of advice, it can only be a positive move for the industry. We’re involved in regular CPD events with various partners and will continue to offer this with a focus on protection.”



Claire Trott: How Scottish tax reform impacts pensions

New income tax rates are causing discrepancies between pension schemes Changes to taxation in Scotland is having an impact on many cross-border issues, and pensions have not escaped unscathed. Not only are administrators having to record and report their Scottish members but we now have greater disparity on the tax relief front. Pensions and property […]


Aviva Investors confirms end of trail commission

Renewal and trail commission is being traded in for a single fee for advisers using Aviva-branded funds from 30 June. Norwood Financial Services partner David Frost contacted Money Marketing saying advisers were not duly warned of the changes by Aviva Investors before being contacted on 7 February. Frost says: “I do not recall anything that allows […]


Which firms are winning the race on wealth management?

Traditional wealth managers have proved themselves to be scalable and profitable businesses despite the hype caused by robo-advice models, analysts say. Wealth managers have also been shown to be more robust than pure asset managers amid mounting pressure on fund performance and fees. While Hargreaves Lansdown and St James’s Place continue to make the headlines […]

Volatility fears take multi-asset fund sales to £1bn

High market volatility in February resulted in more retail investors using multi-asset fund managers and pushing net sales up to £1bn, new figures show. Data from the Investment Association tracking net retail fund sales in February show investors avoided both bond and equity funds with £235m and £136m outflows, respectively. In early February the US […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I think that irrespective of the scope of those being required to demonstrate CPD (and I have no great sympathy for commission driven car or furniture salesmen)most qualified advisers will be carrying it out.

    The ‘gap’ is that they don’t recognise and record it for what it is. 15 hours a year is not an awful lot if that’s your market; just under two and half minutes a day based on 52 weeks or 3.2 minutes based on a 40 week working year.

    Reading new product terms, making specific underwriting queries and handling claims etc, is all CPD. Just record it would be my suggestion

  2. Problem is Duncan that to get 15 hour CPD you have to put much more time in for no reward. Mrs C has just had to send evidence to CII of her CPD – took over an hour to do. An hour here, an hour there. There is only 37 hours in a working week. If you are working 3 days a week the proportion of time spend on mandatory requirement is higher. Cost, more cost, more cost for little actual measureable benefit.

  3. I argued with the CII over the poinbts they had recored for my level 4 until just before the RDR deadline in 2013 as they said I was 5 points short when it was just they would not include on of teh 5 point ecxams with them I had.
    In the end I gave up and my solution was to book R05 (Protection), is theoretically 50 study hours (without ordering or reading a current study manual. I drove for an hour spent 8 minutes filling in the on-line answers, 2 minutes checking them (as youi can’t leave the exam room in the first 10 mins and then drove home, so looking at this from a cost benefit point of view, the most effectvie way of proving my competence it would seem is just to resit R06. I use 2 hours 10 mins of my time (and £100 exam cost) to obtain 50 hours of CPD ratehr than just 15 and prove I still know it and have simply maintained my knowledge of proetcion at the minimum level required for a new level 4 adviser.

  4. @Philip castle

    sitting an exam of course doesn’t count. The clue is in C for continuing. Continuing Professional Development (CPD) has to be continued development not the initial passing of an exam to fulfil the regulatory exam requirement to be able to advise in that area.

Leave a comment