View more on these topics

Advisers claim that Defaqto guide risks IP and CI confusion

Protection advisers have warned that Defaqto’s recommendation to sell cover with high sums assured in the absence of income protection risks promoting bad practice.

Defaqto published a critical-illness insurance guide for advisers last month, which says that CI should not be positioned as a replacement or alternative to IP.

But later on in the guide, a five-point action plan states: “In the absence of income protection, sell high sums assured for income generation.”

Master Adviser senior partner Roy McLoughlin says: “Critical-illness cover is not a replacement for IP. It does completely different things and it should be sitting alongside IP.
“The two biggest causes of absenteeism in the UK – stress and back problems – are not covered by CI. This is really dangerous territory.”

Roxburgh Financial Management financial sales manager Garry Webb says: “From an adviser perspective, you are on dodgy ground if you take this advice.

“If the absence of IP is due to underwriting, it is unlikely you would get CI anyway and if it is due to client choice, I would question the reasons for selling high-value CI. The only possible exception would be if the client has full permanent health insurance from their employer.”

Defaqto insight analyst for protection and author of the guide Ben Heffer says: “It is important that CI is not sold instead of IP but we have to rec-ognise that, due to afford-ability, sometimes IP is not sold, and under those circumstances one has to be careful there is sufficient cover in place.”

Recommended

1

MPs’ report says HMRC service is unacceptable

The Treasury select committee says budget cuts, poor management and inflated expectations of IT projects have caused HM Revenue and Customs’ customer service standards to fall to “unacceptable levels”. In a report on the effectiveness of HMRC, published last week, the committee says the evidence received in its inquiry was “disturbing”. It says: “HMRC’s delivery […]

1

Platforms have responsibility for orphan clients

Platforms have been told they must consider how they will treat orphaned clients who no longer want to deal with their adviser, especially when they have no direct-to-consumer offering. In its platform policy statement, the FSA warns platforms they will have to carefully consider their “contractual obligation” to clients who decide they no longer require […]

IPPR has plan for national pay cover

The Institute for Public Policy Research has called for the introduction of national salary insurance. The thinktank has come up with the idea to address concerns that the welfare system does not reflect the amount that people have paid into National Insurance. Jobseeker’s allowance for people who have paid a minimum level of NI is […]

Barclays profits fall 33 per cent due to PPI payouts

Barclays profits fell 33 per cent in the first half of 2011 to £2.6bn compared to £3.9bn in the same period in 2010. This includes the £1bn set aside for settling payment protection insurance complaints. In June, Barclays promised to pay compensation to all its PPI customers who made a complaint before April 20. The […]

Pension savings-2015

Pension tax relief: parked (for the moment)

The national news agenda has been dominated by pension issues this month. For those that missed it (and there cannot have been many given that this was the lead story in spoken and written media), the Chancellor announced a decision to make no decision on pension tax relief in his 16 March 2016 Budget speech. To […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. While risky, if a client cannot afford IP – and it can be expensive or difficult to underwrite – adding higher CI cover is relatively cheap taking into account the basic plan charge. Protection is often a compromise and the difficult task we have is explaining it clearly.

  2. I can see the purpose of large sums assured CIC plans for client’s who are concerned with care costs, and wish to generate an income to cover these,however, as the contributors state it seem to be very thin ice that Defaqto are skating on with this one.

    Maybe Defaqto need to read Kevin Carr’s article from earlier in the week?

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com