View more on these topics

Adviser trade body warns ‘short’ Brexit transition period may not be enough

New adviser trade body Pimfa has expressed concerns that a 21 month transition deal to leave the EU may not be long enough to reach a final deal firms can use to plan ahead.

The Government announced yesterday that it had agreed a “large part” of the deal for the UK to withdraw from the EU.

While Northern Irish borders are yet to be fully resolved, the UK has agreed to a transition period lasting from 29 March 2019 to 31 December 2020, in which it will be able to strike its own trade deals, EU citizens arriving into the country will retain their rights, and the UK will stay party to existing EU trade deals.

Pimfa, which has campaigned for an extended transition period to avoid a sharp Brexit and disruption for businesses, says that while it welcomes a provisional deal being reached, timeframes may not be enough for businesses to prepare for Brexit.

Pimfa deputy chief executive John Barrass says: “We note the short duration of the proposed transition period…This may allow insufficient time to negotiate the final UK/EU comprehensive agreement which will govern our future relationship after transition. Pimfa has made clear its preference for a flexible transition end determined by the completion and coming into force of the comprehensive agreement, so that firms know ahead of time what they will need to change towards and can plan appropriately.”

The provisional transition deal could be signed off this Friday during a European Council meeting.



British Steel members not given suitability reports before transferring

Some British Steel Pension Scheme members did not receive suitability reports from advisers before they transferred out of the scheme, according to a document published today. A letter from Work and Pensions Select Committee chairman and MP Frank Field to FCA supervision director Megan Butler contains anonymous testimonies from steelworkers. These testimonies shed light on […]


How should advice firms pay their staff?

Advice firms are continuing to review how they reward top IFAs after incentive schemes at large firms have come under question. Adviser remuneration has long been a contentious issue. Should staff be paid a flat salary, should it be linked to income generated or time spent with the firm, or should it be tied to metrics […]


Opinion: M&G Recovery fund – ripe for recovery?

To say that M&G Recovery fund has a long term record is something of an understatement. Launched in 1969 it has an esteemed longer-term history of outperforming the market and was the first investment of its kind. A fund that looked beyond the glamour and excitement of the largest, most successful companies, instead looking for […]

Rayner Spencer Mills: Why we rate the Artemis US Select Fund

Ken Rayner and Graham O¹Neill from RSM explain why they rate the fund, its investment process and how it can be used in a portfolio The Artemis US Select Fund became a RSM ‘rated’ fund earlier this year. In this video, Ken Rayner and Graham O’Neill explain the fund’s investment approach, why they rate it, […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Neil Liversidge 20th March 2018 at 9:45 am

    My personal view is that the sooner the UK leaves the EU the better. Some people want to string it out forever in the hope that we’ll be worn down. That’s the usual way the politicians con the people; wait for the fuss to die down and then do what they really wanted to do all along. Well, they’re not fooling us. Back in December 2017 I wrote a 4000-word letter on Brexit and sent it at my own expense to every MP in Parliament, answering all the Remainers’ spurious arguments. Any Leave supporters who want a copy to send to their own MP, please email me. I’m on the FCA register and/or easy enough to google.

  2. Robert Milligan 20th March 2018 at 10:19 am

    Why O why do we go on about the transition period, surly having left the EU the transition period is not relevant, It means we as a Sovereign Nation will be able to review all and any agreements as and when “Our” elected Government, is required to. After all it worked for the previous several hundred years, it only took thirty or so to prove it did not!

Leave a comment