View more on these topics

Adviser FSA fees lower than expected

The FSA has reduced the amount of fees payable by advisers and mortgage brokers by £11.7m compared to its initial proposals in February.

The regulator has today published its consolidated policy statement on regulatory fees and levies, which sets out the final FSA fee rates and Financial Ombudsman Service levies for 2009/10.

The increase in fees for IFA’s will not be as steep as the FSA estimated in February. The fees, which were slated to rise by 15 per cent, will increase by just 4.8 per cent.

Mortgage brokers will only see a 2.7 per cent hike, compared to the estimated rise of 21.2 per cent.

However the FSA is raising 35.8 per cent more in fees than it did last year. Banks and other deposit takers will see their total fees increase by 109.4 per cent from last year, compared to the 94.9 per cent rise proposed.

Minimum FSA fees will be frozen at 2008/09 levels, as proposed in February’s consultation paper. The FSA says once the financial penalty rebate is applied, approximately 10,000 of the smallest firms will see a fee reduction compared to the previous year.

The FSA says it “works hard to ensure that fees are allocated as fairly as possible, with the largest fee increases being allocated to the firms that require the most use of the extra supervisory resource”.

The Association of Independent Financial Advisers and the Association of Mortgage Intermediaries say IFAs and mortgage advisers will save £11.7m on the initial FSA proposals.

Director general Chris Cummings says: “Following Aifa and Ami’s highly publicised fees campaign I am delighted that FSA has revised the fees paid by IFAs and mortgage advisers.

“Having reviewed the cost allocation across all fee blocks, those firms in the A12, A13, A18 and A19 blocks will be saving £11.7m compared to the proposed fees. This is an appropriate and welcome measure in difficult economic times. Aifa and Ami strongly believe that regulatory resources, and therefore costs, should be focused on those firms that require increased supervision and not those in the IFA and mortgage advice professions.”

Recommended

Price will run Fidelity emerging markets fund

Fidelity is changing the lead manager of its emerging markets fund, with Nick Price replacing Bob von Rekowsky.Price will take over the running of the £352m fund on July 1, with Boston-based Von Rekowsky focusing on managing his existing institutional emerging market equity mandates.Since taking on the emerging markets fund on December 31, 2003, Von […]

Midas back in touch

It has been an interesting 18 months for Midas with mergers, rumours of possible insolvency /bankruptcy, a plummeting share price and poor performance in the Midas funds.Let me deal with the well publicised corporate troubles first. It was reported in January that Midas had breached certain banking covenants. Despite the company trading profitably and generating […]

2

Brand Awareness

Santander has recently announced that it is to scrap its Abbey, Bradford & Bingley and Alliance & Leicester brands on the high street while the Lloyds Banking Group looks to trim the edges of its basket of brands.

Income fund chiefs face dividend conundrum

Schroders income maximiser fund manager Thomas See bel-ieves that many other income fund managers will face a conundrum when it comes to offering dividends.See says that although analysts are anticipating yield levels sticking around the 5 per cent mark for the next year or two, the dividend swap market – where you buy and sell […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. J Alan Campbell 2nd June 2009 at 3:21 pm

    FSA Fees
    They could have reduced the fees further if they had not been so generous paying large bonuses with our fees!

  2. Arbitrary fee setting by the FSA
    The FSA obviously sets fees in a purely arbitrary manner.
    There fees rises for IFA’s and Mortgage Brokers turn out to be one third (IFA’s) and about 12 % for brokers, of the guidance estimates given out only a few months ago.

    So how do they do it, set fees at whatever they think they can get away with?

  3. fsa fees
    well they did only take 20 million in bonuses from our pockets, which is not that much lets be honest, so i suppose with the increases this year they wont be paying themselves much bonus next year of course, oh look at that a pig just flew past my window

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com