View more on these topics

Adding up the bill

In my last article, I considered the severe challenges facing the UK in funding pensions for today&#39s and future pensioners. In this article, I assess the actions that the Government is pressing for and take a view on whether these measures will stimulate the growth of pension savings.

Simple tax legislation

The Treasury published proposals last December to simplify the taxation of pensions radically. Following wide concern about the proposed lifetime allowance of £1.4m, the Chancellor asked the National Audit Office to verify that the maximum fund in his proposals would only have an impact on a very small number of high earners.

In the March Budget, the Chancellor announced that the lifetime allowance is to start from a base of £1.5m. He also announced that the introduction of the new simple tax regime is to be deferred a year until April 2006 (A-Day) to allow all interested parties more time to prepare.

Industry reaction to the creation of a single code has been generally positive but many believe the measures to remove red tape could have gone further.

The Treasury appears to remain concerned over tax abuse by the few, with the consequence of baseline checks required at A-Day on accumulated funds. The communications explaining the new rules will be complicated, even for the vast majority whose savings will be modest compared with the maximum limits.

Simpler rules will lead to fewer, simpler products and medium term, after transitional work, should mean improved service to customers. That said, the taxation rules will still seem complicated to consumers and the new tax treatment does not provide further incentives needed to stimulate growth in pension business.

Pensions Bill

The Government has talked about big reforms for pensions for the past 18 months and firm intentions were finally announced in the Pensions Bill published in Feb- ruary. The Bill sets out several reforms, by far the most interesting and controversial is the Pensions Protection Fund.

The PPF will affect emp-loyers with final-salary schemes. PPF is essentially a compensation scheme hastily devised following the increase in scheme closures.

In some situations, members have had accrued pension rights cut back because the scheme is underfunded. Scheme wind-ups have generated a lot of negative publicity and the Government decided to act.

The PPF will come into effect in April 2005. It will not be retrospective so members of schemes that closed before that date will not get any redress.

The PPF will be financed by a levy on all schemes, with underfunded schemes paying a higher levy.

Will the PPF encourage greater private provision? The worry is that it could actually have a negative impact. It must be acknowledged that employers set up final-salary schemes on a voluntary basis and are legally entitled to close them.

A concern for employers with well-funded schemes is that the levy that they pay will help to cross-subsidise employers with poorly funded schemes.

Many employers will see this as yet another unjustified cost and for some it could be the final straw – with the company deciding to give up providing final-salary pensions and switch to some form of money-purchase scheme.

Historically, these switches have proved detrimental to employees overall pension expectations.

Some commentators believe the Government will need to act as a guarantor in the event the PPF runs into significant deficit, if this compensation scheme is to meet its objectives of raising members&#39 confidence that entitlements will be met. However, the Government has gone on record that the PPF will not receive any public money.

The Pensions Bill also includes other changes, namely:

•Formation of a new pension regulator, (largely changing Opra into a more proactive body that seeks to solve problems rather than react to whistleblowing).

•Greater incentives for pensioners to defer drawing state pensions – such as taxable lump sums.

•Scrapping of MFR to be replaced by scheme based funding standards.

•A reduction in LPI from 5 to 2.5 per cent per annum or price inflation if less for service after April 2005.

•Changes to rules for member nominated trustees and extension of the TUPE rights.

Many of these measures are of a technical nature and will not directly rejuvenate the growth of private pensions, although they will create more work for providers and advisers.

In summary, do the measures in this bill solve the problem of financing pensions for future generations?

Our conclusions are that they will have minimal positive impact. This Government has missed a vital opportunity to act in order to boost private pension savings.

It could have done so and relieved the pressure on the state pension system that is badly creaking and will eventually break under the demographic strain.

Eventually, this or some future Government will rec- ognise that the state pension system will only work if it is a safety net for far fewer pensioners – those who genuinely cannot fend for themselves.

To bring this about requires a vibrant private system that encourages workers to save enough for a decent income in retirement.

We need to continue to press politicians for a long-term strategy.

In my final article, I will discuss some of the opportunities and solutions that the Government could embrace to avert a national pension crisis.

Recommended

AIFAs view

So, farewell then, FSA projection rates. An FSA discussion document will shortly canvass the idea of scrapping the projection regime. I have never understood why the regulator should oblige firms to offer figures which may well turn out to be spurious in the light of events to consumers who are unlikely to understand the economic […]

Out of context

•”Rescue Stuart? That is a grenade I am unwilling to throw myself upon.” – Bright Grey&#39s Mark Locke refusing to save a colleague from an over-talkative IFA. •”I think the Greeks have got it right where women are concerned. The men laze around while the women do all the hard work.” – Bright Grey&#39s Stuart […]

Financial issues MEPS back in Brussels

Three key MEPs working on financial services issues in the European Parliament have regained their seats in the European elections. Conservative MEP Theresa Villiers took 27 per cent of the vote for the London region. Labour MEP Peter Skinner took 14 per cent and Liberal Democrat MEP and Chris Huhne gained 15 per cent both […]

Misys says performance is in line with expectations

Misys says its performance is in line with expectations ahead of its full year results.In a trading statement issued today, executive chairman Kevin Lomax says overall group revenues are expected to be down 10 per cent on last year.He says: “Misys&#39 performance as a group is in line with expectations. In Sesame there are signs […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com