View more on these topics

Action group to fight FSCS

The Keydata Victims Action Group is rallying investors to call for a judicial review of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme’s position of not compensating non-Isa investments.

The group says the difference between an Isa and non-Isa investor is “quite simply wrong and is based on an extremely tenuous legal basis”.

It says: “We are looking for secure income bond 1-3 non-Isa investors who have had their claims rejected by the FSCS to support this activity.

This does not require any assignment of claims to redress. Under civil law, there is a finite period to lodge an appeal and given the clock is ticking we urge investors to act now.”

Advisers recently questioned the FSCS decision not to compensate non-Isa investors in some Keydata plans after pledging to pay out on other plans.

The FSCS has rejected compensation claims in non-Isa secure bonds 1-3 as it cannot establish that the apparent misappropriation of underlying assets results in a liability on Keydata’s part. Last month, the FSCS told Money Marketing it was dealing with claims on a case-by-case basis but is unable to confirm how many standalone non-Isa claims have been successful. It has paid about 3,000 Keydata claims and rejected around 130.

It said: “Although we consider it is possible Keydata breached contractual and other legal obligations owed to non-Isa investors, we cannot be sure on the evidence currently available to us that any such breaches caused a loss giving rise to a valid claim for damages.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What I find amazing is the fact that we as the distributor are being asked to bail out clients who bought a product from a now defunct manufacturer. Does car showrooms pay a levy towards the bailouts the Government throw the way of car manufacturers.

Leave a comment