View more on these topics

ABI urges Govt to scrap guaranteed annuity advice requirement


The Association of British Insurers is calling on the Government to scrap the requirement for savers with a guaranteed annuity rate to take advice.

In a letter to Chancellor George Osborne and FCA chief executive Martin Wheatley, the ABI says the Pension Wise guidance service should be extended to give guidance to those with GARs.

It proposes a “customer control” mechanism that “must allow providers to carry out customer wishes without fear of future redress actions or restrospective regulatory action where the correct steps have been followed”.

The Government has mandated that savers with safeguarded benefits worth more than £30,000 must get regulated advice before taking their pot as cash.

But over the past week national newspapers have slammed pension providers for blocking savers from accessing the pension freedoms, with “expensive” advice costing up to £1,000 listed as one of the barriers.

This week Money Marketing also reported that providers are interpreting the rules around advice in different ways.

The letter also calls on the regulator to specify the products and circumstances where advice should be taken.

It says: “The FCA has in the past hinted that advice should be taken in regard to some products – in particular, drawdown and UFPLS payments”.

The ABI says it wants clarity by 21 July.

In addition, the regulator wants the Treasury to publish detailed information on Pension Wise and restart its marketing campaign.

It also warns against language describing pensions as a bank account and “presenting advice as an unnecessary barrier”.

Royal London backs the trade body in a letter to pensions minister Ros Altmann.

Royal London pensions specialist Fiona Tait says: “When establishing the rules the Government sought to protect customers with guarantees in their pension. But it failed to anticipate the extent of pent-up customer demand to access their ‘own money’. This is creating genuine problems for customers which pension providers cannot address under current rules.

“Pension Wise was set up specifically to provide guidance for everyone eligible for the pension freedoms. It is only right that Pension Wise should be the first port of call for customers, including those with guaranteed annuities. Providers should be able to accept customer requests for pensions encashment if they can prove they have been through the Pension Wise process and understand the implications of giving up guarantees.”

Tait adds that regulated advisers should continue to have an “important” role to play, but largely for those with more complex needs or for defined benefit to defined contribution transfers.



Senior protection figures to exit Friends Life

Senior protection figures are exiting Friends Life as a result of the provider’s merger with Aviva, Money Marketing understands. Friends Life sales and marketing director for individual protection Mark Anders and head of underwriting for individual protection Chris Pollard are understood to be leaving the business. Other senior protection staff at Friends are also thought […]

Pensions-savings-retirement-piggy bank

MM leader: Tough talk on pensions misses the value of advice

Has the rollout of pension freedoms been an almighty disaster? It depends on who you ask, with a gulf emerging between the two camps. In the red corner, the Government and the consumer press are keen to berate providers and the wider financial services industry for not allowing savers to access their pension pot in […]

Asset allocation: Cornelian’s Kilpatrick derisks portfolio from equities

Cornelian Asset Management chief investment officer Hector Kilpatrick is taking risk off the table by selling part of its equity and private equity allocations, on the belief fixed interest and short-dated treasuries will deliver better returns. Over the last three months, Kilpatrick, who manages the £115m SVS Cornelian Growth fund, increased the allocation to fixed interest […]

Artemis Global Income: favouring Europe over the US

With a 10 per cent return from his Global Income Fund in the first three months of 2015, Jacob de Tusch-Lec talks to journalist Alexis Xydias about the drivers and why he favours Europe and Asia over the US. Jacob believes European companies remain cheap and is still finding opportunities amid value stocks – in contrast […]

The future of active management is now

Fees under pressure. Regulatory moves against closet indexers. Rapid advances in financial technology. Shifting sentiment among investors. Such mounting challenges have led to widespread speculation about active management’s shrinking future. But a closer look inside intelligent portfolio construction today tells a story of expanding roles, added value, and innovative risk-adjusted, lower-cost solutions. Four investment experts […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Kind of crazy to want different approach to DB and GARs, and kind of convenient to want protection from regulators and FOS….but i guess the politicians and the courts as always waiting in the wings to look at behaviours and outcomes

  2. Some of the most complicated personal pensions involve GARs…. notably traditional WPs which not only build in GARs but also have guaranteed historic bonuses, minimum values and known future values.

    Some GAR plans have spot guarantees, others don’t – timing therefore can be a major issue (not helped with archaic admin systems many providers hold these plans on)

    Some GARs are on the basis of ‘take it or leave it’ – annually in arrears, no spouse, end when you die perhaps? Others let you build in (for example) different annuity shapes without losing the full GAR benefit.

    There is a clear conflict of interest between the providers (having made promises which they (I guess) assumed would never need to be relied upon and client (who may find their income being almost doubled as a result)….

    You can never really ‘lose’ a DB scheme as a result of your actions but you sure as hell can do yourself some damage if you don’t know what you’re doing with GARs.

Leave a comment