View more on these topics

ABI hits out at ‘no deal is better than bad deal’ Brexit strategy

Huw Evans
ABI director general Huw Evans

The Association of British Insurers has hit out at the Government’s Brexit negotiating strategy that no deal is better than a bad deal.

In a speech at the provider trade body’s Brexit conference today, director general Huw Evans will warn that insurers would not be able to stay compliant and serve customers if the UK left the EU without a deal.

Evans is set to say: “It is unacceptable not to have a Brexit deal at the point at which we leave in 2019. As the Chancellor said…the Brexit process has to be delivered in a way that enables business to operate, and our customers not to suffer any unnecessary detriment.

“To meet our clients’ needs as an industry and ensure full compliance with the law, the Government has to deliver an orderly withdrawal, a stable transition and a sensible and mutually beneficial future trading relationship.”

Evans called on politicians to focus on how long-standing customers, including pension contracts written before Brexit, would be treated after leaving the EU.

He also warned insurers may lose licencses in their customer’s jurisdiction if the UK left the single market, so would be worst placed to pay out on claims.

Evans will say: “Achieving this will take time. It is more important to get it right than to pretend things are simpler than they are and set artificial deadlines. We need cross-party parliamentary co-operation to make the legislative process work. We would like to see a framework established for formal cooperation between the main parties in Westminster and between the two Houses of Parliament.”

Recommended

2

Brexit: Over 40% of EU City workers planning to leave UK

Forty three per cent of EU City workers are planning to leave the UK before the intended deadline for Brexit negotiations in 2019. A survey by law firm Baker McKenzie listed financial services among the top three sectors to be hit as it noted 88 per cent of EU City workers felt more vulnerable to workplace […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I struggle in terms of why ‘no deal is better than a bad deal’ is not common sense to everybody. Whilst I am very positive and optimistic about a good mutual deal, the naivity which suggests a deal where we had a bad EU citizens’ offer, a £100billion bill to leave, £10billion a year to secure some special incentives on trade, no migration controls, EU sovereignty and no international deals outside of the EU’s regime would be better than ‘no deal’.

  2. It is high time that logic prevailed and that the public realise that there are really only two options.

    1.No deal – then relying on WTA (Heaven help us – as no one else will)
    2. Just staying in as before. (I know which I prefer). Anything else is just a display of ignorance of what is actually possible.

Leave a comment