View more on these topics

ABI: Govt and insurers must work together to tackle sickness absence


It is often said in sport that a decision is right when you pull it off and wrong when you do not. Does the same principle apply to protection insurance? If an individual suffers severe illness or injury, leaving them unable to work, and then makes a claim, we would all agree they made the right decision in taking out that policy. But what of the individual who takes out the cover and never needs to claim? Have they made a bad decision to get cover?

A decision to buy protection is not right or wrong based just on whether it is used and taxes to provide welfare are not right or wrong depending on the result. The key for both of these is in the execution of the delivery. When done well, we can praise the good results. But when it is not we should scrutinise how the delivery can be improved, rather than criticising the decision to provide it in the first place.

For too long, the state has provided a system of welfare that has seen individuals leaving work due to sickness or injury falling into long term dependency, often when there is a desire to return to work but the means not to. In August, Department for Work and Pensions secretary

Iain Duncan Smith announced a review of Employment Support Allowance, arguing the current system was “too binary”, with individuals deemed either fit or unfit for work, and nothing in between. He suggested that we need to focus on what the person is capable of and the support they need to continue working, not solely on what they cannot do. Insurers already do this.

Income protection helps people at every point when they need to leave work due to an illness or injury. It can provide them with a better replacement income than the state when they are not working, and rehabilitation and support services can help them recover faster and return to work.

Work adjustments manage long-term impacts on work capacity and sickness absence management systems can act as early warning signs to prevent people leaving the workforce in the first place. Insurers are able to provide more than the Government currently does and is likely to ever be able to.

The Government wants to talk about better ways of providing welfare and tackling sickness absence. Insurers can see this opportunity and are joining the conversation, showing how the solutions can be successfully delivered. We need to keep demonstrating how individuals are better supported when covered by protection and why there is a compelling case for insurers to partner with the Government in a better execution of welfare provision.

The state, having made the decision to review how it provides welfare, needs to look at how to better execute the delivery. Insurers can show them how.

Charlie Campbell is policy adviser at the Association of British Insurers


Nutmeg unveils product plans ahead of advice launch

Nutmeg has revealed ambitious plans for its future product offerings following the firm’s decision to enter the advice market. The direct-to-consumer online discretionary manager is planning to develop a drawdown offering to go alongside its existing personal pension accumulation product, as well as ethical and social investing vehicles and joint accounts for married couples. The […]

Profile: British Friendly’s Iain Clark on driving change in protection

In another life, Iain Clark would have been a racing driver. A keen motorsport fan, the new distribution and marketing director at income protection specialist British Friendly has driven the iconic Brooklands to Monte Carlo rally in Ferraris and Porsches, and, as he casually informs me, is “usually in the top three” when he takes […]


Sunset clause prompts review of fund managers’ legacy charges

Fund managers are reviewing their direct client books over concerns the sunset clause will put them in breach of treating customers fairly rules. Money Marketing understands fund managers are considering slashing their charges at the cost of tens of millions of pounds in revenue as the sunset clause will expose the higher fund management charges […]

Tony Byrne to launch robo-advice service

Milton Keynes-based advice firm Wealth and Tax Management is planning to launch new virtual and robo-advice services from January. Managing director Tony Byrne estimates the firm will offer face-to-face services to savers with more than £250,000, while online advice is expected to target customers with more than £100,000 and robo-advice services to target those with more than £10,000. […]

Greece: the sideshow continues

Artemis managers James Foster, Mark Page and Laurent Millet comment on the Greek deal, describing it as “just another fudge” getting in the way of bigger developments in China, the UK and the US. To read the full article click here.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm