In this spirit, I make the follow- ing points about structural change to existing pension arrangements before A-Day.These legislative changes are the most fundamental and wide-ranging that I can remember in almost 33 years in pensions. This means that every existing pension arrangement needs to be reviewed – and fast. This does not mean that there will be structural change in every case but in many cases that will be the logical outcome. In the particular case of possible transfers to s32 contracts, the key question to ask is: are clients with tax-free cash greater than 25 per cent happy for the long term where they are? If the answer is no, there are two ways to tackle this. One possibility is a block transfer after A-Day, involving at least two people moving their pensions from the same place to the same place on the same day. That will require careful choreography, including the willingness of two people to behave precisely in this way. The other is moving before A-Day to another vehicle in the occupational pension regime. By process of elimination, in most cases, that other vehicle will be a s32. In the case of one-person arrangements, such as existing s32s, where the client is unhappy, a block transfer is a contradiction in terms. In the case of executive personal pensions, where the clients are also the trustees, they need to under- stand the onerous new responsibilities that they are going to take on by default, especially the scheme administrator role as recently defined. If they are not happy about that, they need to plan now what they are going to do about it. There is an enormous job for pension advisers and providers to do bet- ween now and A-Day. Let us get on with it. Stewart Ritchie Director (pensions development), Scottish Equitable
Some IFAs and their clients still have a cliched view of offshore investments as being unregulated and only for the very wealthy or crooks laundering money. For these reasons, many IFAs have steered clear of recommending the offshore market.
UK workers will miss out on 285m of tax breaks this year by failing to take advantage of employee share schemes, according to research by IFA Promotion.The organisation says the figure represents the amount of tax which could be saved if the estimated 865,000 staff currently in a savings related share option scheme invested half […]
Almost three year’s ago, Britannia Building Society launched the best fixed-rate mortgage … ever.
Scottish Widows is questioning the motives of Killik & Co after the stockbroker swit-ched its group pension scheme to a third provider in just two and a half years. Killik will earn commission from Friends Provident as it is acting as its own broker and was also previously paid commission by Widows. Killik marketing director […]
While equity valuations have doubled since the financial crisis, Simon Edelsten explains that there are still pockets of value. But not where you might think Macro-economic uncertainty is causing turbulence in equity markets. Artemis Global Select Fund manager Simon Edelsten says his investment themes are taking him in a different direction to some of his peers – away […]
- Top trends
- Top trends
- Pension tax relief in firing line as Hammond mulls ‘intergenerational fairness’ Budget
- Martin Lewis wins claim against PPI chaser that used his image
- Scottish Widows mulls Standard Life corporate pensions book takeover
- The future of Cofunds: What next for a platform titan?
- How much are advisers charging for pension transfers?
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up
Latest from Money Marketing
Two company directors have been disqualified for a combined 20 years after running a fine wine investment scam that lost investors nearly £1m. An Insolvency Service investigation found that Crimson Fine Wines cold-called customers and then did not purchase or allocate wines to those who had paid for their investments. The investment scheme offered investors […]
AJ Bell has won a case against a client who wanted his platform fees for the past 14 years reduced. A client, referred to as Mr N, complained to the Pensions Ombudsman that, because he did not have enough information about what fees would be payable, he sold a property holding in his Sipp far […]