View more on these topics

A consumer&#39s view

The report from the actuarial profession&#39s working party on transparency and with-profits, published in January, is, predictably, nothing more than a whitewash job. It recommends little that will restore confidence in the industry following the Equitable Life debacle.

“It really means no change,” says an industry insider. “The recommendations to adopt a specific reporting model for with-profits is so complex that the average person still won&#39t be able to understand it.

“Consumers will still have no idea of investment performance, bonus policy, or how charges are structured, because there is no requirement for charges to be explicit. Indeed, the report confirms that with-profits funds will still be able to apply charges retrospectively.”

The report does nothing to correct the abuses of with-profit funds which have been, and still are, widespread throughout the industry. The question of “ownership” of with-profits funds is not dealt with in the report and this is the crux of the problem.

To any investor, it is plain that the surpluses that have built up in with-profits funds belong to past, present and future generations of with-profit investors – definitely not the management or shareholders. No with-profits investor has been consulted about the level of retentions and none would willingly have agreed to the effective confiscation of more than £40bn of investors&#39 assets.

The problem is that, under the guise of smoothing, life companies&#39 actuaries have held back more profit than necessary and built up surpluses which are all too frequently raided to subsidise other parts of the business and to pay for expensive mistakes.

Such cross-subsidy is widespread and totally at odds with the original concept of with-profits. As one actuary put it: “The terms you are currently seeing for investment products in the marketplace are plainly uneconomic. With-profits funds are being used to subsidise this unhealthy situation.”

How can charges possibly be transparent so long as the actuaries allow business losses to be charged to the with-profits fund? Losses, as we have learned very expensively, can seldom be quantified in advance, nor are they usually expected. So there is no way they could be incorporated in with-profits charging structures. Raiding with-profits funds should be stopped immediately and made illegal.

Investment performance is difficult, if not impossible to determine. Charges are not clear and bonus policies are all too frequently totally obscure.

But the report makes no serious attempt to deal with these fundamental criticisms. Indeed, the report makes it clear that investors leaving a with-profits fund before their policy matures will not receive their full share of the investment return – a constant source of aggravation for withprofits investors. The actuaries are quite happy for this unquantified amount to remain for smoothing. This is an unacceptable situation.

The proposals for dealing with bonus calculations and allocation, one of the major mysteries of with-profits investments, are just another exercise in obfuscation. Consumers will no better understand this arcane subject in the future than they do at present.

Nor does the report deal with the fact that by far the greater part of the investment return on a with-profits policy comes in the form of the terminal bonus – which continues to be entirely at the discretion of the actuary. There are no proposals to limit the amount which can be added to the policy as terminal bonus.

It will be a great shame if the Equitable Life debacle has the effect of killing off with-profits investment products. But this document from the actuaries will do nothing to reassure investors or prevent the decline of the industry.

The Government should deal with the fundamental problem of “ownership” of with-profits funds and put a stop immediately to cross-subsidy by ring-fencing with-profits funds. The Government must insist that the surpluses are used for the benefit of the with-profits policyholders.

Second, life offices should be obliged to produce annual investment performance figures for their with-profit funds, showing all charges levied on the fund. They should also be obliged to produce comprehensible annual statements on bonuses with the actuaries justifying their stance.

Sadly, there is little realistic prospect of the Government doing anything at all to reform the with-profits concept – not least because it wants the life industry to promote stakeholder. With the 1 per cent cap on charges, the only way life companies can afford to do this is – yes, you&#39ve guessed it – by raiding the with-profits funds for the marketing costs.

Recommended

Swiss Life UK appoints personal finance actuary

Swiss Life UK is appointing Dave Grimshaw as personal finance actuary, responsible for product development and pricing of individual protection products in the IFA market.Grimshaw joins from Swiss Re Life & Health, where he worked for four years as marketing actuary. He is chairman of the Critical Illness Committee and a member of the Continuous […]

INDEPENDENT VIEW

It should be the bonanza of all times but, with such apathy in the market, it makes you wonder whether the end of the tax year might be a damp squib. There are so many opportunities for us to do heaps of business but perhaps there is too much choice. First, there is the end […]

Give life offices more room to venture forth

The ABI has a shopping list it wants Chancellor Gordon Brown to deal with when he stands up to deliver his Budget. We hope to see the Chancellor announce a wide-ranging review of post-retirement income which would cover everything from annuities and drawdown to all other forms of pensioners&#39 savings. Everyone seems to agree there […]

Fund managers see Europe as safe haven

Fund managers say European funds are set to perform strongly this year according to a survey from the investment fund service Keydata. Fund managers from HSBC, Invesco, Investec, Old Mutual and Threadneedle say with the slowdown in the US economy many investors are now turning their attention to Europe as a safe haven. They say […]

Embrace simplicity!

By Fiona Holmes, proposition communications manager When I first took out critical illness cover, I was overwhelmed. It wasn’t just the form filling, it was finding out about the sheer number of illnesses I was covered for. Did it give me peace of mind that I was covered for neuromyelitis optica or systematic lupus erythematosus? […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com