View more on these topics

A CONSUMER&#39s view

One of the fundamental problems with the FSA&#39s approach to simplified stakeholder products and the basic advice regime is that, no matter how simple the product, without a proper investigation of the individual&#39s finances, aims and requirements, there is always a very real risk of misselling.

Stakeholder pensions are a case in point. It is probably just as well that the vast majority of pension policies sold to individuals have been taken up by the relatively wealthy middle classes – high-income families where the husband has been investing in stakeholders for his non-working wife and children.

This type of investor fully understands what stakeholder pensions are about, wants to take advantage of the tax breaks available and is well aware that once the money is invested it can only be accessed on retirement.

No doubt, these families are wealthy enough to have other savings which can be used to help out their offspring with buying their own home.

But if the postbags to newspapers are typical, there are vast numbers of individuals who do not realise that money invested in a pension cannot be withdrawn until retirement – under any circumstances – just as there are large numbers of individuals who do not realise that if they die one year after taking out an annuity, the money invested frequently dies with them.

For families on average incomes and below, virtually any financial product, except perhaps a bank or building society account, is probably a mistake and could involve the adviser in a claim for misselling at a later date.

The individual&#39s resour-ces are so small that even a minor problem such as two weeks off work with flu could create the need to call on their savings.

For these savers, it is difficult not to agree with John Ellis of the LIA that the stakeholder suite should not include any product where the individual&#39s capital is at risk.

Moreover, even where the capital is not at risk, for example a guaranteed equity bond where a return of capital is guaranteed, or a guaranteed growth bond, where there are either penalties for early encashment or no facility to access the money at all except on death or maturity, the investor could claim misselling if they did not fully appreciate they could not get at their cash in an emergency.

The LIA also makes the very important point that, “the clear lack of understanding thrown up by the FSA&#39s research, shows that many consumers who are subject to advice, may well believe that redress is obtained if anything goes wrong.”

Very true. The regulatory legislation itself has produced a compensation culture and, regardless of whether consumers understand the product or not, an increasing number will claim compensation if problems subsequently emerge.

The FSA proposals for basic advice produce almost as many problems as they are likely to solve. As Ellis points out, when consumers are given any information at all, they quite often take it as advice.

The level of financial ignorance among the general public is high and there is not much enthusiasm among those on average earnings or below to educate themselves – except to work out the broad principle that almost any savings will simply disqualify them from free State social security benefits.

Part of the problem is that the Government is trying to encourage savings among a sector of the population who simply cannot afford to save. It would be better advised to reform the tax regime and release the lower-earning half of the population from tax -at the very least on their small savings.

The Government&#39s own estimates show that 85 per cent of pensioners will qualify for the savings element of pension credit. In other words, they have savings of less than £6,000.

Why not simply abolish tax on savings up to a certain limit? None of these pensioners are wealthy and it is outrageous that they pay any tax at all on income of £10,000 or less – the Government&#39s official poverty level.

For the industry, the real worry is the spectre raised by John Ellis of IFA firms set up specifically to provide “basic advice”. Ellis wants to see basic advice given in the context of IFA firms which are already within the full advisory regime. Otherwise, we face the prospect that all the years of regulation, training and competence will be wasted as “cowboy” sales organisations move into the non-controlled basic advice field.

Recommended

Old Mutual goes for all in one formula

OLD MUTUAL ASSET MANAGEMENT Old Mutual Dynamic Bond Fund Type: Unit trust Aim: Income and growth by investing in fixed-interest securities Minimum investment: Lump sum £1,000, monthly £250 Investment split: 100% in fixed-interest securities Isa link: Yes Pep transfers: YesCharges: Initial 3.5%, annual 1.25% Commission: Initial up to 3%, renewal up to 0.5% Tel: 0808 […]

ScotEq taking mystery out of underwriting to aid IFAs

Scottish Equitable Protect is relaunching its marketing campaign for its smart underwriting service for the IFA market. The relaunch will emph-asise the increase in efficiency with smart underwriting and increase flexibility for IFAs and includes a new version of ScotEq&#39s Underwriting Today protection magazine. Aegon UK head of underwriting Matt Rann says the aim is […]

Final thoughts

I have been told that my pension scheme accrual rate has dropped to 80ths from 60ths, my contribution is going up by 2.5 per cent to 7.5 per cent and my retirement age is being put back to 65 from 60. What should I do? First, look at your contract of employment to make sure […]

Stewart Ritchie on Pensions

One of the most extraordinary aspects of pension tax simplification is the new investment regime after April 6, 2006. For more than a quarter of a century, the Inland Revenue has policed small self-administered schemes to prevent incestuous transactions, investment in residential property, non-income producing assets and so on. When self-invested personal pensions started, the […]

 Article 50 Q&A: The negotiations to watch for 

Holly Cassell, Assistant Manager of the top-performing Neptune UK Mid Cap Fund, discusses the potential near-term impact of Article 50 and the Brexit negotiations that she believes investors should pay most attention to. Read article here Important information  Investment risks  Neptune funds may have a high historic volatility rating and past performance is not a […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com