View more on these topics

Building the Tesla of the advice market

File image of robot in a libraryAdvisers have an edge over the rest of the financial services industry when it comes to building trust

Last month, PR firm Edelman published its annual survey of public trust. It found financial services is people’s least trusted industry. This is not very surprising. Indeed, it echoes research we commissioned from YouGov last year, which showed 70 per cent of people have a negative opinion about financial services.

The problem lies in the relationships firms in this industry build – or fail to build – with their customers. You build trust by building positive emotional connections with people. Financial institutions simply are not set up to do this.

Robo firms signal their advice intentions

But advisers can build personal connections. People want someone to guide them through a landscape they find off-putting and populated by companies they do not trust.

Advisers versus banks 

A good adviser shows understanding, warmth and empathy. By contrast, institutions are driven by process and a narrow focus on finding efficiencies. Short-term profits take priority over long-term relationships.

Consumers want a smooth and painless experience, yet everywhere you look there is friction. It is hard to feel warmth towards a company that makes your life harder. And it is hard to trust a company you do not feel warmly about.

There is also a sense that the industry has, in effect, outsourced its conscience to the regulator. Consumers suspect firms do the right thing more because they have to than because they want to. Imagine meeting a person who was like that. Would you trust them?

No silver bullet

So what can firms do about this cold feeling towards financial services?

A common industry trait is to see technology as the source of all improvement. So-called robo advice is an example of this approach, with new entrants seeking to use automation to improve the customer experience.

Ian McKenna: 12 Christmas wishes for better adviser tech

But technology can only ever be part of the solution. It cannot address the trust problem. A computer cannot show empathy and understanding, and clients will still look for people with these qualities to help them make decisions with confidence.

So, despite the hype we sometimes hear, advisers are not about to be replaced en masse by machines.

But that does not mean they should ignore technology. Far from it. New entrants to financial services, from challenger banks to peer-to-peer lenders, are creating great, friction-free customer experiences. They have well-designed websites, they work seamlessly on mobile and they allow clients to do what they need to quickly and easily.

It is forcing established players to up their game. Over time, clients will come to expect this level of experience across the financial services industry, including from their adviser.

New technologies also mean advisers can now think big. Established companies tend to think incrementally. Look at the way the car industry responded to electric vehicles. At first, they ignored them. Then they came up with hybrids – the least amount of change they felt they could get away with.

Then Tesla came along with a mission to make every single vehicle in the world electric. Now big car companies are struggling to catch up. The Tesla of the advice market would set a target everyone thinks is impossible, like going from 150 clients per adviser to 500, or even 1,000. Crucially, they would aim to do this while also improving the client experience.

How? By using technology to become three or four times more efficient. Technology can do 90 per cent of the heavy lifting, freeing up the adviser to build deep, meaningful and trusted relationships with clients.

Simon Rogerson is chief executive and co-founder of Octopus Investments, part of Octopus Group

Recommended

Justice-Fine-Ban-Court-Gavel-Judge-700x450.jpg
27

Waspi women should be given £15,000 each, Lib Dems say

The Liberal Democrats have called on the Government to correct the “injustice” faced by the Women Against State Pension Inequality Campaign by giving them £15,000 each. Stephen Lloyd, the Liberal Democrat spokesman for work and pensions says the Government should do so immediately. Lloyd argues successive administrations have failed to help women who are set […]

Smith & Williamson quashes talk of acquisition

Smith & Williamson has denied it is still an acquisition target, saying its current focus is on organic growth. In September last year, merger talks between Rathbones and Smith & Williamson broke down. The firm then said in December that any plans it had to list on the London Stock Exchange would not come to […]

Onshore bonds: Still going strong 

Onshore bonds are a once-beloved product, now seemingly ignored by many advisers in favour of the supposedly more glamorous international investment bonds or collective investments. Yes, most onshore bonds don’t have ‘open architecture’ and none deliver exemption from tax on capital gains at fund level or the ability for investors to use their annual exemption […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Not a good idea. On brand reliability Tesla came last out of 30.

    On the other hand it may be appropriate considering that you don’t deign to answer questions put to your website.

  2. Depends on which survey you look at. AutoExpress put Tesla at the top of their reliability survey for last year. They gave them a dependability score of 97.54 out of 100, higher than the usually top-ranking Lexus.
    No problems with mine so far although, like its owner, it doesn`t always get to its destination without stopping for a re-charge.

    • How odd. What Car & JD Power put it last.

      I know several people who have one and each of them has a second car (mainly the antisocial SUVs) which is invariably a diesel.

      I wouldn’t fancy motoring to the South of France in an all electric car.

Leave a comment