Making the most of death benefits under pension freedoms

Mike Morrison 700x450

It still surprises me somewhat that the long-term opportunities of the death benefit regime accompanying the pension freedoms are not fully appreciated by all. Before freedoms were introduced, a pension scheme paid out the death benefits at the trustees’ discretion, informed by the nomination/expression of wish completed by the pension holder. The cheque would be drawn, paid out and owned by whoever received it – be it a spouse, trust, child or other beneficiary. Indeed, one of the concerns on death benefit planning was deferring inheritance tax on first death to the death of a spouse in many cases.

The new rules are very different. Although the expression of wish form is still needed, the money can stay in a pension scheme and, with flexi-access drawdown, the beneficiary can take as much or as little income as they need from the pot, with future successors able to designate any residual benefits on the second death to do the same.

If the pension holder was under age 75 when they died, then the income can be paid tax-free to the beneficiary as long as the plan was designated for drawdown within two years of death. If the pension holder was over 75 at death, then the income will be taxed at the beneficiary’s marginal rate of tax.

So, if the beneficiary needs the income they can take it. If income is not needed, the fund can be left where it continues to have the tax advantages of a pension scheme and the beneficiary can nominate their own “successor” beneficiary. Let’s look at some examples.

Dave and Dawn

Dave Davison dies age 76 and has nominated his wife and his children as beneficiaries to receive income death benefits from his drawdown fund. But does it go to his wife Dawn (designated) or is it passed down to the two children, David and Davina?

It might be that Dawn needs the money and will have to draw on the fund. Tax will be paid at Dawn’s marginal rate. Dawn is currently a higher-rate taxpayer in her role as an accountant.

Dave might be unsure whether Dawn will need the money but it is designated to her just in case. A key advice point might be whether Dawn will continue in her professional role.

“The beneficiary can take as much or as little income as they need from the pot, with future successors able to designate any residual benefits on the second death to do the same”

In the end, she takes little or no money from the fund and nominates David and Davina to be her successors. If she dies before age 75, then these benefits will be tax-free in their hands.

Alternatively, the aim might be to pass the money on immediately to the two children directly from Dave. Again, the tax paid will depend on each child’s marginal rate of tax as Dave was over 75 when he died. It could well be the two children could draw out up to their personal allowance free of tax.

If the children are minors, they will need someone to take parental responsibility and control of the fund. This might not be an issue, particularly if Dawn were available to take this role. To cover the event of her early death, Dawn should make a provision in her will for the appointment of a guardian.

The children will be able to make their own decisions in respect of the fund on reaching 18 and any careful tax planning could all be undone if they decided to take the whole lot and spend it.

If at the start of the process this is a concern, then going down the route of putting benefits into a spousal bypass trust might assist. There might be additional tax and expenses to pay but there will be control by the trustees.

With a large pension fund, the ability to pass it down the generations could continue well into the future, and even to David and Davina’s children.

The key to all this will be a detailed plan, perhaps involving:

  • The potential universe of beneficiaries on death prior to age 75 and their need for income
  • The fact the universe will look different for death after age 75 and now may include the marginal rate payable by the beneficiaries
  • Spousal bypass trusts can give full control and might be a part of any wider solutions.

It is vital to keep the expression of wish form up to date and to revise any plan as circumstances change.

Mike Morrison is head of platform technical at AJ Bell



HMRC in ‘nightmare’ pensions death tax blunder

HMRC has been forced to suspend death benefit reporting after grieving consumers were incorrectly sent notices demanding tax that was not due. Providers have been told to stop sending reports on payments where beneficiaries receive pension payments tax free because the original customer died before the age of 75. This applies to both annuity and […]


Experts warn of death tax hit after two-year deadline

People inheriting pension savings must decide what to do with funds within two years of the member’s death or risk being hit with unnecessary tax charges, experts warn. The coalition Government abolished the death benefit tax on pensions in drawdown or value protected annuities if the member dies before the age of 75. However, this […]


Pension freedom payments pass £6bn mark with Q2 surge

The number of people using the pension freedom reforms to access their savings has surged since April, meaning the total withdrawn from pots has passed the £6bn mark. New figures released by the Treasury today show 159,000 individuals made 256,000 payments totalling £1.8bn between April and June this year. This compares to £820m in Q1 […]

Time to stop the salami slicing on tax relief

Steve Webb  – Director of Policy and External Communications As the Autumn Statement approaches, Steve Webb calls for the Government to stop tinkering with tax relief. Twice a year, in the run-up to the Spring Budget and the Autumn Statement, we face a torrent of speculation as to what changes the Chancellor might make to […]

Planning now for the residence nil-rate band

Graeme Robb, senior technical manager at Prudential, writes about the residence nil-rate band and the advice opportunities it presents for you when tax year-end planning with your clients. On our Planning Matters hub, we considered a widow, Margaret, and a married couple, John and Anne, for whom the residence nil-rate band (RNRB) is influencing planning […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm