View more on these topics

Claire Trott: Protecting clients from lifetime allowance traps

Technical Connection head of pensions strategy Claire TrottMore and more of my conversations with advisers are focused on those clients that have exceeded the lifetime allowance and have either not been eligible for any of the protections available at the time or have invalidated the options before they realised.

There is little the adviser can do; a problem compounded thanks to not knowing what the future holds from one week to the next, let alone in the years to come.

In many cases, these problems arise because clients have deferred defined benefit schemes but no idea of their value and what the implications are for the rest of the money they have been saving.

So what should they do about their lifetime allowance issues? There is no right answer here but there are a number of considerations that must be worked through.

Firstly, do they want and need the guaranteed income from the DB scheme? This is usually a no-brainer: yes, they do. If they are over the lifetime allowance with all their benefits put together, then it is imperative they access their DB scheme first to avoid paying the charge from there.

If they do not need to take the money purchase benefits, there is then the issue of when or if they should crystallise the funds.

If you look at it in a purely technical way, it makes perfect sense to crystallise the money purchase benefits in their entirety as soon as possible to protect
any growth from the lifetime allowance charge.

You need to consider any inheritance tax issues that may occur because of the pension commencement lump sum but this can be mitigated with other investments over the longer term.

If you do decide to crystallise the money purchase scheme and the funds are in drawdown, it needs to be managed so as to ensure any growth taken from the fund is done so in as tax-efficient manner as possible before the client reaches age 75.

This is because any growth will, again, be set against the lifetime allowance and would cause an additional lifetime allowance charge.

This might all sound like perfect sense. However, should the client be considering this at age 65 – even 55 – you have as much as 20 years’ worth of legislation to anticipate.

Is any of this the right thing to do in a world where we do not know whether there will even be a lifetime allowance in a few years’, let alone two decades’, time?

None of us have a crystal ball and the only thing you can really do is explain (and document the fact you have) to clients that this is a risk.

You can protect them from the current legislation but not future unknown changes often suggested by thinktanks and others who believe they have the ear of the Government.

One can only dream of a level of stability in the pension world that would mean clients being sure they are advised correctly.

Claire Trott is head of pensions strategy at Technical Connection

Recommended

Provider DB transfer advice questioned as Aviva considers entry to market

Advisers have expressed concern at Aviva’s potential entry into the DB transfer advice market, as a lack of capacity to provide advice and analysis reports continues to bite. Aviva is considering “whether or not it makes sense” to offer DB transfer advice through its recently launched restricted arm in the wake of increased customer enquiries. Last […]

Sanlam fund managed solely by artificial intelligence

The fund will be the first in the world to be managed by AI and machine learning One of Sanlam Global Investment Solutions’ Ucits funds will now be solely managed through artificial intelligence. The Sanlam managed risk Ucits fund will be the first balanced fund in the world to be driven by AI and machine […]

An open door for scammers?

Recent reports highlight that the Work and Pensions Select Committee of MPs are concerned about the potential for scams following the introduction of Pension Freedoms this year. This is a subject that we have already featured several times on the Jelf Blog, and one that we think is really important for employers (and of course […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Terry Mullender 27th June 2017 at 7:14 am

    The Lifetime Allowance Charge is arbitrary and makes no sense whilst we have an annual (and now a tapered annual) allowance.

    However, lets not forget If my pension fund grows by a pound I still get to keep 45p If I take it as a lump sum. Better than no investment growth and I get nothing….

Leave a comment