View more on these topics

Steve Webb: Why auto-enrolment will pass its greatest test yet

Encouraging factors suggest April’s increase in contributions will not lead to higher opt-out rates after all

The world of workplace pensions has been transformed in the past six years, but we are on the eve of a vital test as to whether this has all been an illusion.

The success of automatic enrolment to date reflects a huge amount of effort by employers, advisers, providers and a whole network of support services, and the results are impressive. More than a million firms have enrolled nearly 10 million workers into a pension.

This is a social and economic experiment on a scale barely without equal across government. Normally, policy is designed by economists on the assumption we are all rational economic men and women. But this policy is based on the fact we are not purely rational – our actions are affected by all sorts of unconscious behavioural biases.

In pure economic theory, whether you are put in a pension and have to opt out or whether you start outside a pension and have to opt in should make very little difference to the outcome. Yet the experience of auto-enrolment to date is that it makes a huge difference.

So far, roughly nine in 10 workers who have been enrolled have simply stayed enrolled, and for those enrolled when they join a new firm the staying-in rate is closer to 95 per cent.

When the Government set up this programme, it assumed roughly one in three workers would opt out. This assumption was based on asking people the hypothetical question as to what they “would do” if they were enrolled. As we know, they behaved very differently, which is perhaps not surprising given we are talking about “unconscious” behavioural biases.

But there is, of course, a nagging doubt in all of this. Has the success of auto-enrolment to date simply been because the mandatory contributions are so low? Will people start opting out in their droves once contribution rates rise, including a five-fold increase in employee contributions between now and April 2019?

There are very strong reasons to think that the number of people who will simply drop out of workplace pensions in April this year and next will be very low. The first is simply that inertia remains a wonderful thing. The same factors that led people to stay enrolled against their expectations when contributions were at 1 per cent remain in force when contributions rise.

While there could obviously come a time when affordability trumps inertia, it seems unlikely that, for most workers, an increase of a few pounds a week will be the tipping point.

For evidence on this we can look to the US, where a number of workplace 401(k) schemes have experimented with various ways of stepping up minimum contributions from low initial levels. The clear pattern is that when people are stepping up at low-single-digit levels of contributions, the cost is not enough to overcome the inertia of staying put.

The second reason for confidence is that the lowest-paid workers – who might be expected to be the most likely to opt out – will get a big pay rise in April. The National Living Wage (for those aged over 25) will rise by 4.4 per cent, with further increases planned in future years. This increase will be more than enough to absorb an increase in pension contributions at the level planned.

Apart from those on the NLW, many more people will see a routine pay rise in April. Although wage growth is currently running below the rate of inflation at around 2.4 per cent a year, this is still more than the 2 per cent rise in pension contributions workers will have to make, especially allowing for tax relief on those contributions.

On top of this, April is the time each year when the starting point for income tax and National Insurance contributions is increased, which leads to a small reduction in direct tax bills. Coupled with a routine pay rise, the large majority of auto-enrolled workers will still see a rise in their take-home pay in April, even after the deduction of increased pension contributions.

Given that few people will be able to (or will choose to) work out what their take-home pay would have been without the pension change, there is every reason to expect most will take this increase in their stride.

We should, of course, seek to communicate the changes effectively to make sure workers feel that they are in control of what is happening.

But remember that when auto-enrolment was first introduced, most workers saw an actual cut in their take-home pay – and yet 90 per cent stayed in.
As long as most people see a small rise in their take-home pay this April, I firmly believe we will be able to keep them in pension saving.

Steve Webb is director of policy at Royal London

Recommended

7

PI insurers express caution over ‘high-risk’ DB transfers as advisers struggle for cover

Professional indemnity insurance providers have acknowledged that they see DB pension transfers as a high-risk area, as experts continue to express fears over the breadth of coverage for IFAs. While the FCA recently proposed measures to stop PI policies from excluding the Financial Services Compensation Scheme as a claimant and discussed the possibility of a […]

Cash-Wallet-Consumer-Retail-Shopping-700x450.jpg

Spring Statement: Wage growth needed to underpin auto-enrolment increases

Wage growth is needed to ensure workers do not opt out from auto-enrolment when contribution rates increase over the next 12 months. That is the view of Aviva savings and retirement head Alistair McQueen, who was responding to the latest Office for Budget Responsibility forecast released after the Spring Statement. Auto-enrolment contribution rates will increase to […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Robert Milligan 20th March 2018 at 1:48 pm

    Bang Bang Bang , the drum by a Product Provider, Auto Enrolment is a SCANDLE, I suppose with 43.6 Billion paid into this scurrilous sector by HMRC pays for this kind of obfuscation, what we need is to abolish the Pensions Industry, and use the Tax mans money better, Mr Webb if and I say if, you were qualified to give advice, you would most likely think differently, there are far more important things regarding savings than putting money into a pension, Happy to discuss in open forum!!!

  2. As you rightly say Steve the acid test is next month! However auto enrolment has created its own challenges. It’s all well and good compelling membership but what of?
    The next piece of work must be engagement so people don’t feel disenfranchised from their workplace pension. How is that going to work? People rightly need to know what they are contributing to and what it will mean in retirement terms. I really hope this issue is part of the strategy and not a bolt on afterthought!

Leave a comment