View more on these topics

Three reasons behind the shrinking high yield bond market

It seems erasing the memory of a debt trauma takes more than low interest rates, particularly in Europe and the US

A strange phenomenon is transpiring in the high yield bond market: ever lower yields are not translating into more borrowing by companies. Eight years into a bull market, with close to record low yield levels, corporates appear to lack the exuberant animal spirits that, in the past, would have encouraged a leveraging up of balance sheets.

It seems the scars of the financial crisis continue to run deep. For some time now, we have noted the experience of Japan and the lasting impact of a balance sheet recession on both corporate and household attitudes to debt. It is also the case that a low growth and low inflation backdrop makes it hard for companies to envisage growing into a highly indebted capital structure.

Europe led the way in this regard but it is fascinating to see similar footprints in the US. Thus, the US high yield market is beginning to shrink. In doing so, it is following the lead of the European high yield market where the par value (notional amount) of bonds outstanding peaked in 2014 and has been notably lower ever since (see chart). So what are the driving forces behind this?

Changing corporate behaviour

As mentioned, facing an economic environment with stagnant growth, European corporates have remained relatively conservative in their behaviour. This is particularly noteworthy given how cheaply European corporates can borrow in public bond markets. The European investment grade market currently yields 0.75 per cent and the European high yield market yields 2.12 per cent. The lure of cheap debt seems to exert little force on the European corporate psyche. This has not been the case in the US, where investment grade companies have taken full advantage of lower bond yields in this cycle in order to return cash to equity investors.

The US high yield market, how-ever, seems to have more in common with Europe, driven by a cautious attitude among private equity sponsors. This is very different to the gung‑ho attitude exhibited during the 2005-07 private equity boom.

Rising stars

While the number of credit rating downgrades has exceeded the number of upgrades in the high yield universe, the volume of debt being upgraded to investment grade has far outweighed that being downgraded to the high yield index.

Typically, it is companies with the bigger capital structures (which make up a larger part of high yield indices) that are engaged in improving their credit profile. Not only does this give them access to cheaper and more plentiful funding (should they need it) in the investment grade market, if and when this cycle eventually turns, they will also be in a relatively better position to weather the storm. The result is — across both US and Europe — a smaller high yield market, as more bonds are upgraded to investment grade.

In fact, Barclays estimates €20bn of debt (par value) will migrate from high yield to investment grade in 2018, with just approximately €5bn going in the opposite direction.

Companies preferring loans

In addition to corporates’ changing business strategies, the high yield bond market has faced cannibalisation from its sister asset class, leveraged loans.

Indeed, possibly the biggest trend in the past two to three years for the high yield market has been the resurgence of loan issuance driven by the continued strong demand for collateralised loan obligations and a sense of protection offered by floating rate notes in a rising rate environment (or not, as the case may be).

Borrowers have tended to prefer leveraged loan structures, which typically come with far fewer covenants, allowing more operational flexibility for the issuing firm. Over 75 per cent of loans outstanding are classified as “cov-lite”.

In addition to this, the issuers retain the ability to repay or refinance the terms of these loans at very short notice. A large part of loan activity, particularly this year, has been companies refinancing outstanding loans at lower margins.

There is a lot of overlap in the companies that issue high yield bonds and issue debt (loans), and it is no coincidence the rapid increase in leveraged loans has coincided with a period of decline for high yield debt. Since the end of 2014, the US high yield market has shrunk by 3.7 per cent while the loan market has grown by 12.7 per cent.

In aggregate, the combined size of the US loan and high yield bond markets has been broadly stable since 2014. Again, this is very different to the wave of mega- leveraged buyouts, which expanded the high yield and loan markets in the 2005-07 period.

There are many aspects of this credit and business cycle that continue to surprise investors and differ from the textbook expectations of an aging bull market. Our guidepost for much of the divergence in behaviour between European and US corporations continues to be the experience of Japan in recent decades; erasing the memory of a debt trauma takes more than low interest rates.

In contrast, areas where we have observed a willingness to binge on debt in this business cycle are emerging market corporates, US investment grade companies and the household sector in Australia and Canada. Each such debt boom presents different investment opportunities and risks to unconstrained bond investors. Divergence remains the dominant theme.

Jenna Barnard is co-head of strategic fixed income at Janus Henderson Investors



Why bond managers are positive on ‘rising stars’

Corporate bonds that fell into high yield just under two years ago are now on their way to investment grade, becoming what are known as “rising stars” and creating opportunities for bond managers. In Q1 2016, 51 companies became so-called “fallen angels”, dropping from investment grade to high yield, compared to 45 in the whole of […]

Investment Uncovered: Do corporate bonds need inflation proofing?

This month, inflation climbed to a five-year high of 3 per cent. Insight Inflation-linked Corporate Bond fund manager David Hooker argues corporate bonds with direct inflation protection offer better returns than inflation-linked gilts as Money Marketing crunches the numbers. Talk us through the fund The fund aims to give investors a return that, in the […]


Advisers are wrong to break away from bonds

They say politics is more determined by negative drivers than positive. Clown-like or otherwise, Donald Trump, Nigel Farage et al are anti-politicians who embody many of the characteristics that people feel are absent from their mainstream rivals. There has been a clear pendulum swing away from mainstream political institutions as wider disillusionment with the establishment […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment