You can bank on Woodford
The probability of a depression has increased when you consider that the people in charge (and the opposition for that matter) have no idea what is happening. In essence, there is simply too much debt in the system, this is why our banks are in such a mess. In fact, I believe Barclays, RBS and the newly enlarged Lloyds are likely to be nationalised. You could argue that RBS already has been. These banks may be profitable in terms of their day-to-day trading but they are working under the shadow of such vast liabilities that their future looks very dark indeed.
If we go into a 1930s-style depression there will be little hiding place other than government bonds (gilts). However, no one really knows if it will get that bad and, despite the problems, I think it still makes sense to have some exposure to the stockmarket. Seeking out top-quality managers is more important than ever though, which is why I believe investors should consider Neil Woodford's Invesco Perpetual income and high-income funds. The two funds are essentially identical.
He has significant exposure in the pharmaceutical sector, which was an unpopular sector until the last year when it has been relatively strong. His biggest weightings here include the global firms GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca. Since the turn of this century, he has been a great fan of tobacco stocks. Whatever your view of tobacco, from a pure investment point of view, he has been in the right place for some time as the sector has been prospering. He has weightings in the US giant Reynolds American plus BAT and Imperial Tobacco in the UK.
As you can see, he is looking for companies which are likely to be resilient to the deterioration in the economy. In the main, this means larger companies, which often have a lot of exposure to overseas markets. So if you look at tobacco, it has huge barriers to entry (that is, the existing companies have the market sewn up - who is going to start up a new cigarette firm and compete with them?) and excellent earnings. Another advantage to many of these international companies, including BP and BG, is that much of their operations are declared in overseas currencies. The depreciation of sterling is a huge advantage to them and the fund has been able to benefit indirectly.
The funds currently have an attractive yield of over 4 per cent (net), which looks particularly good when you consider the appallingly low rates on cash deposit. While Mr Woodford himself is bearish on the UK economy, he is bullish on the prospects for his portfolio. As the market begins to latch on to the value of the resilience and dividend potential of these companies, their share prices should start to appreciate - this, of course, depends on the economy avoiding a Great Depression scenario.
Finally, the changes to this sector, which are due to be fully implemented in February by the IMA, will inevitably place Neil Woodford's fund in the new income & growth sector. This strikes me as completely barmy and comes at the worst possible time as many firms are bound to cut their dividends over the coming months. While Mr Woodford's dividend history is less consistent than others, over the long term he has provided investors with superb income growth. To eject his funds (and those like them) out of the sector helps nobody and may cause harm and greater confusion.
Neil Woodford remains one of the managers in which I have most trust and if any fund can navigate through these treacherous waters it is the Invesco Perpetual equity income funds.
Mark Dampier is head of research at Hargreaves Lansdown