<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Money Marketing - most recent commented stories</title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/xmlservers/RecentlyCommentedStoriestRSS.aspx</link>
<description>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/xmlservers/RecentlyCommentedStoriestRSS.aspx</description>

<item>
<title>Bank clerk who stole from elderly clients goes on the run</title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/regulation/bank-clerk-who-stole-from-elderly-clients-goes-on-the-run/1008503.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/regulation/bank-clerk-who-stole-from-elderly-clients-goes-on-the-run/1008503.article</guid>
<description>so people...are we happy with our mob justice rule??</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:11 GMT</pubDate>
<displayDate>18 Mar 2010 9:11 am</displayDate>
<user><name></name>
<id></id>
<anon>1</anon></user>
</item>
<item>
<title>Income protection must be the priority product</title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/protection/income-protection-must-be-the-priority-product/1008466.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/protection/income-protection-must-be-the-priority-product/1008466.article</guid>
<description>"it pays up to 60% of your lost income "

This was about Group, which can pay up to 75% or even 80%.

And I think this emphasizes how advisers do not appreciate how Group Income Protection can be a much better product than individual.  Which I think was part of the point of this article.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:10 GMT</pubDate>
<displayDate>18 Mar 2010 9:10 am</displayDate>
<user><name></name>
<id></id>
<anon>1</anon></user>
</item>
<item>
<title>What is Capita's role in Arch Cru debacle?</title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/investments/what-is-capitas-role-in-arch-cru-debacle?/1008153.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/investments/what-is-capitas-role-in-arch-cru-debacle?/1008153.article</guid>
<description>Re: Gerry Brightman  Jon Maguire no longer has any connection with the Regulatory Legal Arch Capita compensation group.  The group had in fact started to gather information from Cru and Maguire with a view to taking legal action, hence the fall out.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:43 GMT</pubDate>
<displayDate>18 Mar 2010 8:43 am</displayDate>
<user><name></name>
<id></id>
<anon>1</anon></user>
</item>
<item>
<title>FSA should figure it out</title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/fsa-should-figure-it-out/1008485.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/fsa-should-figure-it-out/1008485.article</guid>
<description>I fully agree with the article and  I left banking 12 years ago after being with a clearer for 25 years. It was high pressure sales then, having to report why I had arranged a non endowment mortgage etc. It has become worse since then. The banks simply vcannot be trusted as they are able to agree their own levels of commission owing to their clout in the marketplace. Has nobody thought about simply standardising commissions across the board?</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:23 GMT</pubDate>
<displayDate>18 Mar 2010 8:23 am</displayDate>
<user><name></name>
<id></id>
<anon>0</anon></user>
</item>
<item>
<title>Friends Provident MD Simon Clamp dies</title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/pensions/friends-provident-md-simon-clamp-dies/1008304.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/pensions/friends-provident-md-simon-clamp-dies/1008304.article</guid>
<description>I met Simon when I started work as a humble  Receptionist at Scottish Life Ass Co in Poultry.

My life changed and with Simon's help, I gained the confidence to make new friends take control of my life financially.

Thank you Simon</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:15 GMT</pubDate>
<displayDate>17 Mar 2010 11:15 pm</displayDate>
<user><name></name>
<id></id>
<anon>0</anon></user>
</item>
<item>
<title>The financial advisers who earn too much</title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/adviser-news/the-financial-advisers-who-earn-too-much/1007676.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/adviser-news/the-financial-advisers-who-earn-too-much/1007676.article</guid>
<description>Quote: "Same old story, a failed IFA hits out at his hard working proffessional ex-colleagues..."

Call me a pedant but shouldn't a true ‘professional’ at least be able to spell the word?  And an anonymous poster thinks it disgraceful that he barely earns more than a mechanic (without having the financial nous to understand the costs of running a fully equipped garage or realising that mechanic possess considerably more skill than most IFAs).

Anyone who seriously can't understand the problem with commission-based advice at last being dealt with by the FSA shouldn't have a job involving numbers.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:53 GMT</pubDate>
<displayDate>17 Mar 2010 10:53 pm</displayDate>
<user><name></name>
<id></id>
<anon>0</anon></user>
</item>
<item>
<title>FSA budget rises 18.3%, Sants warns better regulation costs more</title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/regulation/fsa-budget-rises-183-sants-warns-better-regulation-costs-more/1008575.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/regulation/fsa-budget-rises-183-sants-warns-better-regulation-costs-more/1008575.article</guid>
<description>Sants is out of tiny mind.  'Better regulation cost more'.  Is he totally deranged?  Better of anything cost less.  That's what capitalism does.  Every day, more for less.  What he's doing is bureacratism.  It's the economics of the mad house.

And as predicted when it failed, the FSA is now going round shooting people for no better reason than it can.  This is truly truly disgraceful behaviour.  It is latent totalitariansim.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:58 GMT</pubDate>
<displayDate>17 Mar 2010 6:58 pm</displayDate>
<user><name></name>
<id></id>
<anon>0</anon></user>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cofunds apologises for Park Row letter</title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/wrap-and-technology/cofunds-apologises-for-park-row-letter/1008517.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/wrap-and-technology/cofunds-apologises-for-park-row-letter/1008517.article</guid>
<description>On balance, looks to me like Cofunds did the right thing in apologising for a clerical error.  They can't accept business when the ifa isn't authorised so don't see what the big problem is.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:49 GMT</pubDate>
<displayDate>17 Mar 2010 5:49 pm</displayDate>
<user><name></name>
<id></id>
<anon>1</anon></user>
</item>
<item>
<title>FSA prepares for new financial stability objectives </title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/regulation/fsa-prepares-for-new-financial-stability-objectives/1008581.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/regulation/fsa-prepares-for-new-financial-stability-objectives/1008581.article</guid>
<description>Apologies for second posting didn't think it was posted so repeated myself !!</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:24 GMT</pubDate>
<displayDate>17 Mar 2010 5:24 pm</displayDate>
<user><name></name>
<id></id>
<anon>0</anon></user>
</item>
<item>
<title>Nest to charge AMC plus 2% to recoup costs</title>
<link>http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/pensions/nest-to-charge-amc-plus-2-to-recoup-costs/1008444.article</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.moneymarketing.co.uk/pensions/nest-to-charge-amc-plus-2-to-recoup-costs/1008444.article</guid>
<description>who could have thought they could ***K up worse than stakeholder, what a cluster***** of incompetence</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:08 GMT</pubDate>
<displayDate>17 Mar 2010 5:08 pm</displayDate>
<user><name></name>
<id></id>
<anon>0</anon></user>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		