This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Platforms playing down rebate rules

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Platforms have been accused of playing down the fact that they are already required to disclose full details of rebates under Mifid rules.

The Mifid rule on inducements states that a firm must not accept any fee or commission in relation to designated investment business unless it is “clearly disclosed to the client in a manner that is comprehensive, accurate and understandable, before the provision of the service.”

Platforms have to comply with this rule and disclose the rebates they receive but only on request. But Novia says, in reality, platforms are not doing enough to let clients know that rebate information is available.

CEO Bill Vasilieff says: “My impression is that although the regulations say that rebates have to be provided if reques-ted, people are not aware of this and, for their own reasons, some platforms play it down and do not make clients aware.”

He says the same platforms that are trying to hide rebates are also guilty of blocking re-registration between platforms.

He adds: “Some platforms still try to hide the rebates when they are legally obliged to disclose them. This behaviour is nothing to do with benefiting the inv-estor - it is all about their own commercial interests and it flies in the face of transparency.”

But a spokesman for Skandia says: “We know what the Mifid requirements are and we conform to those by disclosing rebate information to customers that ask. I do not see how that is playing it down. The reality is that we have had very few requests for the information from customers which is indicative of how unimportant it is to them.”

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (2)

  • Incredibly self-serving to suggest that transaparency is only required on request. Feels like the commission disclosure debate of 1995 all over again. The simple approach is to remove this question mark, deal with the costs of transitioning and move on.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • In my capacity as an adviser, i.e. the representative of many clients who have money on platforms, I recently requested this information from FundsNetwork and Skandia and it has not been forthcoming. Suggest the Skandia spokesman is not aware of the bigger picture.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Second Opinion

sponsored by Bright Grey

Second Opinion

sponsored by Bright Grey

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Will a change in spending power see a rise in the number of female clients?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments