This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
Money Marketing Cover
Categories:Advisers

The angry view from a closed-life call centre

  • Print
  • Comments (64)

Matt Worthington, a former call centre worker for a closed-life company, has a few things to get off his chest.

The CII has been throwing a lot of weight behind the concept of “professionalism” lately; both internally and externally. Last week’s Money Marketing article is just one example of their current lobbying for “a requirement for firms to demonstrate professionalism”.

I would like to add my own voice to the call for (delete as applicable) IFAs/financial planners/asset managers/wealth managers/money gurus/wealth creation consultants to demonstrate a greater degree of professionalism.

Now, I am not writing to you as a regulator, or a trade body, or a client, or even as a fellow IFA, but as a call centre operator for a large, closed-book life and pension provider. Every day I deal with an average of 70 calls; from clients, IFAs, solicitors, accountants, bank managers, tax inspectors, HR consultants, funeral directors, welfare benefits officers…the list goes on and on. And each caller will come on the line with a differing degree of financial awareness, and a differing degree of professionalism.

As you would imagine (and hope!) IFAs tend to score top in the financial awareness field. But consistently, and disappointingly, my colleagues and I find IFAs to be the least professional people we deal with.

Basic courtesy and politeness is a given from most callers, but all too often lacking from IFAs. And I’ve never been shouted at by a solicitor, but again, it is a common occurrence from IFAs. Same story for being sworn at or personally insulted. We would never expect an accountant or a bank manager to hurl abuse down the line like a drunk at a football match, but sadly we tend to anticipate it from IFAs.

I understand your frustrations, definitely. You’re kept on hold for ages (with some pretty dire hold music, I admit). You have to go through the same repetitive data protection routine over and over again. Then sometimes we can’t give you the information you need. Or we give you the wrong information. Or we tell you it’ll have to be sent in writing, which takes a few weeks. Plus postage.

As a company we’re not perfect, but what company is? And as call centre operators we’re obviously not going to have the same breadth and depth of experience and knowledge as you are. Otherwise we wouldn’t be call centre operators; we’d be IFAs. I know we are “the face of the company”, but please, show some respect to people trying to do their job as best they can.

Contrary to popular belief, we call centre operators aren’t actually responsible for setting HMRC’s trivial commutation rules. Nor do we have much say in when Royal Mail decide to deliver the quotes we posted to you. And surprising as it may be, if you decide to transfer your clients substantial funds to the far reaches of the globe, we don’t have the authority to “bypass that ridiculous anti-money laundering malarkey and chuck the cash over sharpish”.

Shouting and swearing at a minimum wage call centre operator because you feel that the “f***ing company is stealing my clients money”  will never get you a result.  On the other hand, “I’d like to discuss my concerns over the charging structure of your product” sounds much better, doesn’t it? And far more likely to get a half-decent factual response.

I’m pleased to say that I’m putting this behind me now. I am leaving the call centre for a small asset management firm, having (like most of my colleagues) studied for my first qualifications (PFS Diploma in Regulated Financial Planning, PFS Certificate in Financial Planning, CII Award in Financial Administration, and IMA Certificate in Money Advice Practice).

Anyway, rant over. Sincere apologies to the polite and professional IFAs out there - I have enjoyed speaking with you and dealing with your queries. No doubts I’ll share your call centre frustrations in the near future, but whatever I encounter, I wholly intend to maintain a polite and professional manner in all of my communications; not just those with fee-paying or prospective clients.

Matt Worthington

 

  • Print
  • Comments (64)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Taxbriefs Advantage
Advantage is a digital reference source giving unbiased, independent, answers to your technical queries. Subscribe to Taxbriefs Advantage.

Readers' comments (64)

  • No one likes delays or poor service. IFAs are often reliant on providers to give information to them in order to provide this to their clients.

    If there are delays or mistakes, the IFAs have to then deal with concerned or angry clients, who start to think something terrible may have happened to their money if they don't get an instant answer.

    On the other hand, it is perfectly okay for an IFA to be angry about poor service, but there is no excuse for being rude. I don't think any call centre operator would take issue with an IFA who makes it clear that he is not happy with the service, but does so in a professional manager. That operator is then, as is the way with human nature, going to be more inclined to assist to solve the problem.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Funny IFA - if you honestly believe that abuse and unpleasantries are reasonable strategies to employ when you're not getting your way, then I pity your lack of social skills. I understand that poor service can be frustrating and I see the nobility of standing up for Joe Public (not platitudes, I do actually mean every word of that). But being rude and abusive is truly more reflective of the abuser than the recipient.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Matt I do sympathise and it must be particularly galling as you are (or were) at least an ONSHORE call centre. Not that there is any excuse for bad manners, but perhaps you also need to see the other side of the coin.
    Unlike the other ‘professionals’ with whom you came into contact IFAs have to suffer most from hopeless offshore call centres and appalling life office service - the worst of which comes from closed life offices who really don’t give a toss as all they want are the assets and advisers and clients just get in the way of the profit and asset stripping.
    You need to work in an IFA office for a week or two to experience the frustration, annoyance and waste of time engendered. Admittedly it isn’t the fault of call centre staff, they do get the messy end of the stick and your employers know that only too well. They are cosseted and protected behind you and will rarely step up to the plate.
    Life offices might be bad, but those still offering a proposition do sometimes try. Closed offices are the bête noir of the industry and when it comes to being unprofessional they are the Gold Medal winners – not us.
    I hope that puts matters a little in perspective. And I do feel sympathy for the people on the front line. You are the ones to carry the can and are abused by both sides and undervalued and underpaid by your employer. No wonder really that firms go offshore – they probably can’t get people in the UK to be Aunt Sally’s

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • excellent piece of factual advice on how to be nice to ordinary people.

    it's a pity the FSA were not more forth right in dealing with the clients that Matt describes (fred the shred)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Some of the anonymous comments here are pretty preposterous and frankly I don't get why they are allowed - rant over!

    I think it is absolutely fair for any of us to expect to be dealt with, with respect and tolerance and in this respect I can endorse Matt's comments without hesitation.

    On the other hand providers who arm themselves with staff that are trained to only basic levels and support them with poor systems are kidding themselves if they think their clients are going to put up with shoddy service.

    I rarely bother phoning call centres any more because the responses are generally not worth the time and effort employed. I'm bored with listening to Vivaldi or Greensleeves, then going through the energy sapping i/d verification process only to be told that I can't be given the information I'm calling about.

    This failure to provide the required help is then usually compounded by the ever so cheerful call centre operative, repeatedly asking me if there's anything else they can 'help' me with today. Now given that they usually haven't actually helped me with anything in the first place tends to drive the frustration a bit further.

    So as mentioned I cannot in any way excuse bad manners, abusive or intolerant language and behaviour but do undertand how it happens. The answer is simple - don't bother with call centres!

    Whilst on the subject of such however, is it me or does anyone else become at least mildly irked when a call centre operative calls your firm and then attempts to go through the i/d verification process when they have called you.

    On one occasion going all ironic, I attempted to turn the tables and asked a charming Indian sounding lady for her date of birth, mother's maiden name, first school she attended, favourite holiday destination, name of current pet etc but unfortunately she just didn't get it.

    On a more serious note though, why do closed life offices realistically expect to retain client assets when they deliver such tosh?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Many years ago I worked for insurers. During that time I was amazed at the number of so-called professionals (Insurance Brokers and IFAs) who would resort to bullying instead of negotiation to get what they thought they wanted. I was also amazed at the number of times it worked, except at one company. The branch manager would cancel the agency of anyone who abused his staff and he ran one of the most successful branches in that company.

    I am sorry (but not entirely surprised) to read that times haven't changed the deplorable practice of abuse. Those guilty of it would do well to remember that you catch more flies with honey than with vinegar.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Throughout the comments, I can see that a majority of IFA's and employees of providers agree on 2 things. Firstly, that providers do sometimes give less than stellar service. Secondly, that the most professional and productive thing for an IFA to do when experiencing this type of service is to be polite yet firm in expressing their displeasure.

    Then, in the minority, we have the IFA's who believe that perceived poor service is an absolute justification for abuse, anger and unpleasantries.

    To the first group, my apologies that we haven't lived up to your expectations and I will try my best to resolve things as quickly as possible when our paths cross.

    To the second group, I still apologise and will still try to resolve your issues as professionally as I can, but please be aware that you actually make it more difficult and protracted for me to do so. Finally, for the second group, please read the following quote from John Lennon...

    “When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down ‘happy’. They told me I didn’t understand the assignment, and I told them they didn’t understand life.”

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Duncan Carter, the 'energy sapping id verification process' is called Data Protection and is what stands in the way of YOUR CLIENTS becoming a victim of Fraud.

    If a company has to call you back to discuss something about YOUR CLIENTS, then of course the same protection is offered; I for one am glad that my data isn't given out without verification to anyone pushy enough.

    Presumably the 'Indian sounding lady' didn't get your attempt at irony because the information that you asked her for isn't information that you would hold, so could not be used to verify the company. Hopefully you felt adequately amused and superior though.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @anonymous 3.34pm. To provide classified information to anyone who calls you purporting to be acting on behalf of a company with whom you do business is rather naive to say the least.

    Fine if you call them, but not if they call you!

    Data protection is an important process and on this I am sure that we all agree, but sometimes the provision of such information needs to be viewed from both sides of the street. How do I know that the person who calls me is actually who they say they are?

    The problem with some call-centres is that many of their processes are ill thought out and not user-friendly and it is this aspect which adds fuel to any fire.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I’ve been on the receiving end of a 35 minute, highly unpleasant rant from an IFA who regularly posts in here. He was seeking £5,000 damages from the insurance company I worked for, to recompense him for his time. What time did he waste? He chose to refuse to complete a form confirm that he had verified the identity of his customer. It was a simple form, with four clear instructions on the front.

    I’m not a call centre worker (though like many, it’s where I started my career,). I am a highly skilled compliance professional with a deep understanding of UK and European anti money laundering legislation. I offered to speak to him when a query was escalated from the sales team, to explain, in laymans terms, why an insurance company would require someone submitting a large single premium for an insurance to confirm that had checked the customers identity.

    His response was that not only did he have no idea what his legal requirements were in terms of money launder, he had no intention to find out, because as an IFA, why should he. He also maintained that no IFA knew, but I think that says more about the company he keeps.

    Whilst the above speaks volumes, what really got me is he didn’t show any interest in whether the delay in transferring fund had either a beneficial or detrimental impact on the number of units purchased in the investment bond he was transferring over to. Even when I offered to find out, so he could explain this to his customer given it seemed likely the delay had been to the customers benefit, he told me not to bother, he just wanted £5,000.

    Most IFAs provide a really valuable service to their client and to the financial services industry as a whole. There is a small minority that give the rest a bad name. If the IFA sector gets its act together and can unite behind a single industry body, one of the first tasks of that body must be root out the rotten wood.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10 per page | 20 per page | 50 per page |

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Do you agree with calls for a flat 30% rate of pensions tax relief?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments