This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

Uncertainty remains over compete clauses

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Law firm Foot Anstey has lent its support to the Tax Incentivised Savings Association’s work to come up with an industry consensus on restrictive covenants in adviser contracts.

The move follows Towry’s High Court case against Raymond James and seven former Edward Jones advisers. Towry alleged that after its acquisition of Edward Jones, the seven advisers breached non-solicitation clauses in their contracts which prevented them from contacting clients for up to 12 months. All claims were dismissed last week.

In the wake of the case, the Tisa distribution advisory council will start work to establish an industry consensus on how such contract clauses should apply to financial services. Both Towry and Raymond James are Tisa members.

Foot Anstey financial and commercial disputes associate Jonathan Kitchin says the judgment did not address whether strict non-dealing and non- compete clauses are enforceable, so these issues remain outstanding for the industry.

He says: “Tisa’s work in trying to get some consensus on this is helpful. It would be really good for the industry if there was a voluntary code of practice that firms could sign up to which sets out in clear English and in a concise way what the expectations on both sides are.

“It would be good to be able to have an up-front conversation about it.”

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (1)

  • I would think that European Law, which supercedes UK Law states that competition must not be hindered in any way.

    I don't think you could possibly win a case with an anti compete / dealing or solicitation clause.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


Do you see the value in adviser trade bodies?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments