This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+Cover+small+181214
Categories:Regulation

RBS to pay £2m fine over Direct Line and Churchill altering complaint files

  • Print
  • Comment

The FSA has fined RBS subsidiaries Direct Line Insurance and Churchill Insurance Company £2.2m for altering customer complaint files before passing them to the regulator to be reviewed.

Royal Bank of Scotland is responsible for paying the fine, which is the second fine within a year for the group after RBS and NatWest were fined £2.8m for poor complaint handling last January.

The latest fine relates to 50 closed complaint files submitted to the FSA for review. Out of the 50 files, 27 had been altered before being passed to the FSA. A further seven internal documents contained staff signatures forged by a member of staff.

The FSA reviewed Direct Line and Churchill’s complaint-handling process in May 2009 and highlighted areas to improve. In February 2010, the FSA planned a second review and requested a list of general insurance complaints closed between February 1 and March 31 2010, from which the FSA would select a sample to review.

Ahead of the FSA review, Direct Line and Churchill asked a major accountancy firm to review 110 closed complaint files, with 28 per cent of the files failing the review. The firms’ customer relations management then held two conference calls with 200 staff. Staff were told to “think about what they could do in the next eight working days to ensure the files were of an acceptable standard” and said anyone found not to be working to the required standard would face disciplinary investigation.

FSA acting director of enforcement and financial crime Tracey McDermott says: “This is a serious breach. The firms’ attempt to ensure that complete files were provided to the FSA backfired.”

Plan Money director Peter Chadborn says: “This sounds like line management at its worse. People may say the fine is insignificant but it is the naming and shaming which does far more harm to RBS’s reputation.”

  • Print
  • Comment

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

AXA Wealth


Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Will providers be forced to pay out compensation over annuity misselling?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments