This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+Cover+small+181214
Categories:Other,Regulation

MM leader: Europe could undermine RDR plans

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

It was always likely that some tough negotiations would be required by the FSA to ensure the RDR is not derailed by European legislation.

A leak of the latest draft of Mifid II, revealed last week by Money Marketing, highlights the size of the task.

It suggests the European Commission is looking to ban commission for independent advisers but not for other forms of advice.

If this was translated into the final rules, the FSA would need to agree an exemption with the European Commission to allow it to continue with its ban on commission for all forms of investment advice.

The FSA had trouble trying to convince the EC of the need to gold-plate the original directive, with the regulator forced to drop mandatory use of the menu and IDD.

With the commission currently looking to push through directives on a maximum harmonisation basis, it is in no mood for national regulators adding their own bells and whistles.

The FSA’s best bet is negotiating to ensure the final directive is worded to complement, rather than undermine, the RDR.

The UK has a unique financial advice landscape within Europe and undertakes a constant battle to guard against the unintended consequences of new rules.

The FSA’s RDR reforms have many supporters in Europe, for instance, the Netherlands is looking to ban all commission, and the regulator will hope other states will help it press its case to extend the commission ban.

But, with the horse-trading that takes place behind the scenes in the formation of such directives, it is by no means certain the FSA will prevail.

The RDR reforms were drawn up as a complete package. Allowing an unlevel playing field through the different treatment of independent and other advisers would completely undermine the goals of the review and lead to a market distortion which would more than likely favour the banks.

The FSA has always argued that waiting for Europe to update Mifid before finalising the RDR would lead to a loss of momentum for the reforms and that, as the EC agrees with the general direction of the review, there was no need to take a waitand-see approach.

This faith will soon be tested. If the FSA fails to win this critical argument, it could cast a shadow over much of its reforms.

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (1)

  • I have never been a fan of the European Commission as I think it is as undemocratic as FSA itself. However if the FSA is unaccountable to TSC and all other Government departments in the UK, I do welcome the European Commission's interference.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

AXA Wealth

Is there a growing need for financial advice


Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Will providers be forced to pay out compensation over annuity misselling?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments