This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.

MM leader: Deadline dogma risks wrecking success of RDR

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

Last week’s policy statement from the FSA failed to give platforms, providers or advisers the clarity they were craving as they look to change their business models in the run-up to 2013.

The FSA expressed its “desire” to ban both cash rebates between providers and investors and payments between fund managers and platforms, although it says more consumer research was needed before making a final decision. Considering the way the regulator has already flip-flopped its way through platform discussion and consultation papers, many firms will be loath to bet their futures on this being the final set of rules.

The FSA is also carrying out a guidance consultation on how to clear up the current headaches over defining what sort of business should fall under the FSA’s RDR legacy commission rules.

Given the huge potential impact of the platform fees and legacy commission rules on firms large and small, the FSA’s position that the RDR remuneration changes will still come into force on January 1, 2013 is becoming less and less tenable.

Understandably, much of the focus and energy behind calls for the FSA to be more pragmatic in implementing the RDR has been over the new qualification requirements.

The Treasury select committee has taken a commendable stance in calling for a one-year delay and a softening of the cliff-edge deadline in certain circumstances for experienced advisers.

However, in focusing too much qualifications there is a danger that other, potentially more worrying issues, are overlooked.

This week, Prudential joined Zurich in calling for a delay to the new remuneration requirements due to concerns that providers will not have time to get their systems in place by the current deadlines. Others have privately expressed similar concerns to Money Marketing.

With the continuing lack of clarity over platform fees, legacy commission and VAT, the arguments for the FSA to act are becoming more compelling.

When senior staff at the FSA decided on its January 31, 2013 deadline for introducing the RDR, we are sure they did not envisage a situation where, with less than17 months to go, so much has yet to be set in stone.

In continuing to stick to its arbitrary deadline the FSA risks undermining the admirable RDR goals for the sake of not losing a bit of face - hardly a positive consumer outcome.

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (3)

  • What about a compromise. IFAs stop complaining about the deadline for level 4, accepting that there is no reason why this should be delayed. In return, the FSA delay the inmplementation of charging rules for a year, to give everybody time to agree on, and implement, a workable system. That way, nobody loses (too much) face.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I would agree entirely Charles but I think the FSA would love to launch the RDR to the public having achieved the three aims of the RDR at the same time. They would want to advertise the RDR as a complete package and anything less than than all three elements included would appear to be embarrassing especially as the most appealing element to consumers is possibly adviser charging.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • All this talk of delay and compromise reminds me of the eastern front in 1943.

    Everyday my generals were complaining about one thing or another - demanding to be allowed to retreat, to re-think our plans, to get things right before acting, to be more flexible.

    Well I showed them who was boss. No retreating, no change of plan, no compromise. Nurse is it time for my medication ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data

Editor's Pick


How do you plan to vote at the general election?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments