Lessons to be learned from PPI
Financial services has long held a tradition of innovation and without it we would be denied access to products and services that allow us to live more fulfilling lives.
Perhaps due to this innovation the sector also faces risk as the world evolves around it.
Quite rightly, the industry will always be under the spotlight from customers and regulators and must respond appropriately when it is asked to remedy an issue.
So what can we learn from the experiences of the current PPI claims situation?
Of course, preserving the reputation of the industry and the provider are of paramount importance and how claims are managed will make the difference between solving a problem and adding to a frustration.
In this situation ‘good’ isn’t good enough. You have to be exceptional, which in practical terms could be the difference between retaining or losing a valuable client.
To do this it won’t be enough to merely have first class processes - systems delivering world class consistent processing and management - without a skilled trained and TCF focused resource.
The people using this resource must be fully trained, skilled in customer empathy, service and completely focused on the aims and objectives of the TCF guidance.
Managing and processing a complaint or claim efficiently can often add to one’s reputation but it must be done in a timely fashion.
In order to improve this ‘readiness’, organisations must be proactive using data analytics to identify enquiry or complaint patterns and use this insight as an early indicator of what is to come and in some cases use this to pre-empt and prevent further issues by intervention with key customer segments.
And through everything that you do, regular transparent communication with the policyholder will be essential.
They could already be in a ‘wronged’ state of mind and if this is compounded by leaving them in the dark they will becoming increasingly impatient and angry and this may irrevocably damage reputations.
Being able to manage the inevitable spikes in activity, continuously delivering a professional and timely service meeting customer expectations is essential.
Having the skilled resource or access to a trusted and reputable skilled resource, capable of delivering a seamless branded service is a key requirement if one’s reputation is to be protected and even enhanced through a major remediation programme.
Stuart Hayman is a senior business consultant at Vertex
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing
Most popular
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
Aegon moves ARC platform admin in-house from Novia
-
Co-op halts new business lending
-
FCA fines JP Morgan International Bank £3.1m for wealth management failings
-
'Catch us if you can': Small firms to dodge auto-enrolment duties
Most commented
-
Neil Liversidge: Would anyone use 'hard fees' if they didn't have to?
-
Nic Cicutti: Advisers and fund managers need to tackle their charges
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
FCA under pressure to re-think Sipp cap-ad plans
-
Threesixty launches DFM due diligence service
Most emailed
-
Providers: Scottish independence could end pension tax relief for millions
-
Just Retirement to launch long-term care annuity as sales slump
-
'Money Sickness Syndrome' doubles since credit crunch
-
BoI reverses mortgage rate hike for 1,200 borrowers
-
FCA fines JP Morgan International Bank £3.1m for wealth management failings






Readers' comments (1)
Julian Stevens | 8 Jun 2011 11:07 pm
It's all very well to talk about lessons to be learned, but what about the fact that the FSA allowed the mass mis-selling of MPPI by the banks to go on for so many years without doing anything to stop it?
And how can the continuing payment of huge salaries and bonuses to senior staff at the FSA be justified when set against this massive dereliction of regulatory duty?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment