This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.
X
MM+Cover+small+181214
Categories:Advisers,Regulation

IFP moots NHS-style approach to advice

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

The Institute of Financial Planning has suggested that simplified advice could be delivered through a NHS-style framework where the Government pays or contributes to the costs of mass market advice.

IFP chief executive Nick Cann (pictured) put forward the idea in a webcast broadcast yesterday on simplified advice.

He believes there is mileage in a simplified advice solution which would see the Government pay advisers for providing straightforward advice. He says clients with more complex advice needs would then be more happy to pay for financial advice as they are receiving a specialist service.

Cann says: “We know in the financial planning world that clients will pay for advice, and if they want a particular type of financial planning advice they will happily pay the sorts of fees that are needed.

“But is there some scope to look at more Government support for an NHS-type service where advisers and firms would get paid for delivering particular types of service to clients? The whole notion appeals to me somewhat and I think it is worthy of further exploration.”

In March FSA chief executive Hector Sants revealed plans to consult on guidance for simplified advice, and admitted that simplified advice will be crucial post RDR. The paper is expected this summer.

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

Daily Email Updates
If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest news and analysis from Money Marketing.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre
Build your annual CPD - you can log and plan your CPD hours for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.

Money Marketing Awards 2015
Put your firm forward as the leading practitioner in your field. Adviser and Advertising categories are open to entries - Enter Now.

Readers' comments (3)

  • The problem is that too often "it is worthy of further exploration" becomes a rail roading without the investigation taking place first.
    I agere with Nick Cann, it IS worthy of further exploration, but no more than that....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Truly, it is a fortunate man who experiences so little government interference in his business and personal affairs that he decides to actively seek more of it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Nick old son, you are off your trolley.
    I don't doubt that the FSA would love the idea as it completes their Fabianistic aim of nationalisation by regulation. But do you seriously think that quality advisers are going to spend time advising those that would access such a service? The opportunity cost to them would be huge. So the advisers you will get will be clueless functionaries with zero interest in the outcomes for clients, produce capture would explode as it has in the failed NHS.
    Give me strength. The economic ignorance exhibited by our professional leadership is breathtaking and disgraceful.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your sayEdit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

AXA Wealth


Fund Data

Editor's Pick



Poll

Two years on from the RDR, do you think consumers are better off as a result?

Job of the week

Latest jobs

View all jobs

Most recent comments

View more comments