FSCS sets aside £30m to repay firms over Keydata

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has made a £30m provision to repay firms who have been overcharged as a result of the £326m interim levy charged to the industry to pay for claims relating to Keydata.
In its annual report and accounts published today, the FSCS reveals firms who have applied for a reduction in the amount they were levied based on tariff data they submitted to the FSA have put in claims for refunds totalling £80m.
The FSCS says: “Based on the best information available to directors, provision for £30m has been made in the accounts. The final amount that is likely to be repaid is uncertain and may potentially result in a material adjustment to the provision being required.
“Any resulting adjustment to the levy is likely to be made in 2011/12.”
An FSCS spokeswoman says no additional levy for Keydata has been announced, but any additional levy or any amount that is ultimately returned to firms will depend on the total number of Keydata claims, the final levy amount, and what is recovered.
The FSCS paid out a total of £535m in 2010/11, £214m of which was paid to Keydata investors.
The failure of Keydata and stockbroking firms amounted to 60 per cent of the new claims from the investment sector.
The cost of running the FSCS in 2010/11 was just under £37m compared to a budget of £32.7m, which it says reflects higher than expected claims during the year.
If you enjoyed this article, sign up here to receive daily email updates from Money Marketing and Follow @_moneymarketing





Readers' comments (4)
Old Dog | 1 Jul 2011 3:24 pm
I am completely staggered that the FSCS paid out HALF A BILLION due to firm failures in a one year period.
I bet a significant proportion was mis-ascribed to IFA's having to pick up the pieces.
I really did not become an IFA to be a Lloyds Name.
If I'd wanted to be a Lloyds Name I would have signed up with Lloyds.
FRIGHTENING
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Julian Stevens | 1 Jul 2011 5:43 pm
Why is the repayment of what's been overpaid going to require yet another extra levy on the industry?
What the FSCS appears to be saying is that because some firms have overpaid, then all other firms are going to have to pay even more so that refunds can be made.
But hang on a minute ~ what's become of all the money that was overpaid to begin with?
Can anybody explain what the FSCS has done with what appears now to be a missing £30m?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Rod | 2 Jul 2011 12:39 pm
Old dog I bet you didn't vote for a communist government, no legal rights of appeal in Law or the Magna carta to be overruled by regulators, because I didn't. I wonder when the regulators who oversee our industry will take some responsobility!!!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment
Wheatley IFA | 4 Jul 2011 1:33 pm
Staggering.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment